Enlarging Regional Disparities in Energy Intensity within China

Abstract

As energy saving and emission reduction become a global action, the disparity in energy intensity between different regions is a new rising problem that stems a country's or region's energy‐saving potential. Here we collect China's provincial panel data (1995–2017) of primary and final energy consumption to evaluate China's unequal and polarized regional pattern in energy intensity, decompose the inequality index into contributing components, and investigate possible driving factors behind the unequal pattern both regionally and structurally, for the first time. The results show that China's interprovince disparities in energy intensity increase and are exacerbated by the enlarging disparities in energy intensity between the least developed and most developed regions of China. The causes for this phenomenon are as follows: (i) rather loose regulatory measures on mitigating coal consumption; (ii) inferior energy processing technology in areas specializing in energy‐intensive industries; (iii) increasing interregional energy fluxes embodied in trade; and (iv) separate jurisdictions at provincial administrative levels. These factors can synthetically result in unintended spillover to areas with inferior green technologies, suggesting an increasingly uneven distribution of energy‐intensive and carbon‐intensive industries and usage of clean energy. The results reveal the necessities of regional coordination and cooperation to achieve a green economy.

Heterogeneous performances and consequences of China’s industrial environmental governance: clean production vs. end-of-pipe treatment

“…Industrial structure (IS). Industrialization relies heavily on energy and resource inputs and has been regarded as the main cause of environmental pollution in China (Zhao et al 2016;Shao et al 2020). Moreover, industrial productivity in China is plagued by resource misallocation and overcapacity (Chen et al 2019).…”

“…The "Five-Year Plan" (FYP) is a series of social and economic development initiatives created every five years, and is commonly viewed as a guide for China's local governments to perform their duties (Kahn et al 2015;Shao et al 2020). In China's different FYP periods, measures and policies on pollution reduction varied.…”

Household CH4 and N2O Footprints of Major Economies

“…To date, different indicators have been applied to measure the GHG emission levels in economies, especially by comparing the relation between GDP and GHG emission per capita (Steinberger et al., 2012). In addition, the inequality with regard to economic development and carbon emissions between developed and developing countries has received increasing attention (López et al., 2016; Shan et al., 2019; Shao et al., 2020). In some poor countries, the gap between rich and poor was larger, also led to the inequality of carbon footprints in those countries (Hubacek, Baiocchi, Feng, Muñoz Castillo, et al., 2017).…”