Enklawa scytyjskiego kręgu kulturowego w południowo-wschodniej Polsce

Czopek, Sylwester

doi:10.23858/pa67.2019.007

Cited by 9 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Organic and fine chamotte were the most common admixture, while crushed stones were less frequently used. 6 The next time horizon (Late Neolithic and a different way of farming (Czopek 1999) -a population of the TRB and a younger unit -the Corded Ware culture (CWC) (Fig. 4).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Settlement patterns of the Prehistoric and Early Historic communities in the Kańczuga Upland

Kolebuk¹

2022

Acta Archaeol. Carpath.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this paper is to reconstruct settlement preferences and the dynamics of cultural changes that occurred in the sheet of Polish Archaeological Record (Archeologiczne Zdjęcie Polski = AZP) no. 105–80, located on the Kańczuga Upland. The materials for analysis were collected over several seasons of surface surveys in which 210 archaeological sites were identified. The obtained results show that this region was very attractive for both hunter-gatherers and settled communities.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Settlement patterns of the Prehistoric and Early Historic communities in the Kańczuga Upland

Kolebuk¹

2022

Acta Archaeol. Carpath.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Rozpoznanie wielkiego grodziska w Chotyńcu z całym zapleczem regionalnym otworzyło nowe możliwości interpretacyjne także dla wschodniołużyckiego świata (Trybała-Zawiślak 2019, 264-311;. Trzeba zaznaczyć, że badania "chotynieckie" ciągle trwają, a systematycznie publikowane są kolejne źródła i ich interpretacje (Czopek 2019;Czopek, Krąpiec 2020;Czopek et al 2021;Burghardt 2020;. Obecność tak ważnego ośrodka, nie tylko osadniczego, ale zapewne też administracyjnego i obrzędowego, wyjaśnia znaczące nagromadzenie w całej wschodniej strefie "łużyckiej" zabytków tzw.…”

Section: Południowy Wschódunclassified

Koniec „łużyckiego świata”

Czopek

2022

Mat i Spra Rzesz Oś Arch

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article is devoted to the disappearance of the Lusatian cultural circle, also traditionally called the Lusatian culture or, in more recent literature, the Lusatian urnfields. At the beginning, terminological issues are clarified and views on the disappearance of this cultural unit, which played an important role in Central Europe in the middle of the 2nd and 1st millennium BC, are presented. The main analytical part focuses on four regions within today’s borders of Poland – north-western, north-eastern, south-western and south-eastern. This is due to the sharply outlined foreign cultural features that are particularly sharp in these regions. This applies to the infiltration of the Jastorf culture (and earlier Nordic influences), the Baltic circle, the Hallstatt cultural complex and the Eastern European nomadic world. They are the aftermath of migration movements of varying intensity and chronology, but always within the early Iron Age (9th/8th–5th centuries BC). Signs of the structural crisis of the local Lusatian communities, which are very fragmented and do not constitute a cultural monolith, are also important for the considerations undertaken. The issue of changes in the natural environment on the border of the subboreal and subatlantic periods is also considered.

show abstract

“…10); 10 -kłodnica; 11 -kosin (burial no. 8/1925); 12 -Býčí skála cave (Bukowski 1977;czopek 2007;czopek et al 2016;czopek 2019;Gedl 2004; the second Kelermes period (the last two decades of the VII -the first quarter (third?) of the VI c. BC; Grechko 2013).…”

Section: Variant Of Chronological Schemes Synchronizationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Chronological schemes of the Late Hallstatt period (HaD) in Central Europe: new opportuni-ties for the synchronization and refinement of dates

Grechko

2020

Spraw. Arch.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Unification of regional chronological schemes is one of the key issues in Early Iron Age archaeology. The main markers of the Late Hallstatt period are Scythian arrowheads and antique imports. Biconical glass beads, produced at the Yahorlyk settlement (in the first third of the VIth century BC), were found in the Eastern European Forest-Steppe and in the area of the Tarnobrzeg Lusatian Culture. This period is synchronised with the HaD1 of Central Europe, phase III/1 of the TLC and the late group of burials of the second phase of the Kelermes period. Its final phase is associated with the so-called “Scythian invasions” in Central Europe, which led to the decline of the Chotyniec agglomeration, West-Podolian and East-Podolian groups. A few TLC complexes of the Grodzisko Dolne, site 22, can be dated somewhat later, to the middle or second half of the VIth century BC (HaD2). Also, at this time, the Pomeranian population appeared in the south-eastern area of the Lusatian tribes and a new culture model (post Lusatian-Pomeranian stage) arose.

show abstract

Enklawa scytyjskiego kręgu kulturowego w południowo-wschodniej Polsce

Cited by 9 publications

References 4 publications

Settlement patterns of the Prehistoric and Early Historic communities in the Kańczuga Upland

Settlement patterns of the Prehistoric and Early Historic communities in the Kańczuga Upland

Koniec „łużyckiego świata”

Chronological schemes of the Late Hallstatt period (HaD) in Central Europe: new opportuni-ties for the synchronization and refinement of dates

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About