2022
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.752519
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing Visuospatial Working Memory Performance Using Intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation Over the Right Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex

Abstract: Noninvasive brain stimulation provides a promising approach for the treatment of neuropsychiatric conditions. Despite the increasing research on the facilitatory effects of this kind of stimulation on the cognitive processes, the majority of the studies have used the standard stimulation approaches such as the transcranial direct current stimulation and the conventional repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) which seem to be limited in robustness and the duration of the transient effects. However,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
0
2

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
(136 reference statements)
0
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite a large sample size and a randomised sham-controlled cross-over design, we did not nd evidence that prolonged iTBS over the LDLPFC induced behavioural or neuropsychological effects on working memory and cognitive control. This nding is in contrast with other studies which have reported signi cant behavioural effects with active rTMS targeting LDLPFC on such measures 30,[59][60][61] . It is possible that methodological differences between studies (e.g., rTMS parameters, EEG and ERP processing methods) may potentially explain discrepancies in ndings.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Despite a large sample size and a randomised sham-controlled cross-over design, we did not nd evidence that prolonged iTBS over the LDLPFC induced behavioural or neuropsychological effects on working memory and cognitive control. This nding is in contrast with other studies which have reported signi cant behavioural effects with active rTMS targeting LDLPFC on such measures 30,[59][60][61] . It is possible that methodological differences between studies (e.g., rTMS parameters, EEG and ERP processing methods) may potentially explain discrepancies in ndings.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Despite a large sample size and a randomised sham-controlled cross-over design, we did not find evidence that prolonged iTBS over the LDLPFC induced behavioural or neuropsychological effects on working memory and cognitive control. This finding is in contrast with other studies that have reported significant behavioural effects with active rTMS targeting LDLPFC on such measures 31,33,69,70 . It is possible that methodological differences between studies (e.g., rTMS parameters, EEG and ERP processing methods) may explain discrepancies in findings.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%