2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.1473-6861.2002.00018.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing user involvement through interprofessional education in healthcare: the case of cancer services

Abstract: Recent developments in UK health policy seek to place the service user at the centre of service delivery, although user involvement is a complex and challenging process. This paper explores the contribution of interprofessional (IP) education to user involvement, focusing on education and training within a UK cancer network. The impact of participation in educational projects on users is explored and the benefits and limitations of IP education are discussed. Triangulation of data from several sources suggests… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This perception of threat may be due to role ambiguity and a loss of autonomy, control and power (Daykin et al, 2002;Felton and Stickley, 2004). However, whilst service users wanted to participate in groups in order to receive support and companionship from their peers, medical educators wanted to include groups in order to allow multiple voices to be heard, therefore guarding against the common criticism of 'tokenism' (Felton and Stickley, 2004):…”
Section: Theme 2: Who Can Be Involved?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This perception of threat may be due to role ambiguity and a loss of autonomy, control and power (Daykin et al, 2002;Felton and Stickley, 2004). However, whilst service users wanted to participate in groups in order to receive support and companionship from their peers, medical educators wanted to include groups in order to allow multiple voices to be heard, therefore guarding against the common criticism of 'tokenism' (Felton and Stickley, 2004):…”
Section: Theme 2: Who Can Be Involved?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Training based on personal history and insight is relatively new, and can be stressful for the trainer and the learner (e.g. Turner et al . 2000, Daykin et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Barriers to meaningful patient participation include power structures, perceptions of expertise attributed to the primacy of scientific knowledge over lived experience, and anxiety among professionals about talking to, and learning directly from, patients. 2,4,5,10…”
Section: Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%