2019 26th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/apsec48747.2019.00013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing Unsupervised Requirements Traceability with Sequential Semantics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Study reference Title PS36 [53] Learning effective query transformations for enhanced requirements trace retrieval PS37 [65] Towards a generic framework for requirements traceability management for SysML language PS38 [66] Enhancing unsupervised requirements traceability with sequential semantics PS39 [54] Requirements Tracing on Target (RETRO) enhanced with an automated thesaurus builder PS40 [67] Exploring traceability links via issues for detailed requirements coverage reports PS41 [55] Tracing requirements to tests with high precision and recall PS42 [46] A context-based information retrieval technique for recovering use-case-to-source-code trace links in embedded software systems PS43 [68] Automatically tracing dependability requirements via term-based relevance feedback PS44 [98] A study to support agile methods through traceability PS45 [56] Ontology-based trace retrieval PS46 [69] An ontology-based multi-agent system to support requirements traceability in multi-site software development environment PS47 [100] An ontology-based approach to support for requirements traceability in agile development PS48 [101] Towards requirements reuse by implementing traceability in agile development PS49 [74] An empirical study on project-specific traceability strategies PS50 [80] Evolving software trace links between requirements and source code PS51 [79] Successful deployment of requirements traceability in a commercial engineering organization… really PS52 [75] Motivation matters in the traceability trenches PS53 [19] Towards end-to-end traceability: Insights and implications from five case studies PS54 [83] Traceability-based change awareness PS55 [23] Lightweight traceability for the agile architect PS56 [82] Wolf: Supporting impact analysis activities in distributed software development PS57 [81] Automatic traceability maintenance via machine learning classification PS58 [95] A quality model for the systematic assessment of requirements traceability PS59 [21] A streamlined, cost-effective database approach to manage requirements traceability PS60 [57] A comparative evaluation of two user-feedback techniques for requirements trace retrieval PS61 …”
Section: Idmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Study reference Title PS36 [53] Learning effective query transformations for enhanced requirements trace retrieval PS37 [65] Towards a generic framework for requirements traceability management for SysML language PS38 [66] Enhancing unsupervised requirements traceability with sequential semantics PS39 [54] Requirements Tracing on Target (RETRO) enhanced with an automated thesaurus builder PS40 [67] Exploring traceability links via issues for detailed requirements coverage reports PS41 [55] Tracing requirements to tests with high precision and recall PS42 [46] A context-based information retrieval technique for recovering use-case-to-source-code trace links in embedded software systems PS43 [68] Automatically tracing dependability requirements via term-based relevance feedback PS44 [98] A study to support agile methods through traceability PS45 [56] Ontology-based trace retrieval PS46 [69] An ontology-based multi-agent system to support requirements traceability in multi-site software development environment PS47 [100] An ontology-based approach to support for requirements traceability in agile development PS48 [101] Towards requirements reuse by implementing traceability in agile development PS49 [74] An empirical study on project-specific traceability strategies PS50 [80] Evolving software trace links between requirements and source code PS51 [79] Successful deployment of requirements traceability in a commercial engineering organization… really PS52 [75] Motivation matters in the traceability trenches PS53 [19] Towards end-to-end traceability: Insights and implications from five case studies PS54 [83] Traceability-based change awareness PS55 [23] Lightweight traceability for the agile architect PS56 [82] Wolf: Supporting impact analysis activities in distributed software development PS57 [81] Automatic traceability maintenance via machine learning classification PS58 [95] A quality model for the systematic assessment of requirements traceability PS59 [21] A streamlined, cost-effective database approach to manage requirements traceability PS60 [57] A comparative evaluation of two user-feedback techniques for requirements trace retrieval PS61 …”
Section: Idmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to take semantics into account other approaches use topic models [13] or word embeddings [10], [11], [14] but miss the opportunity to utilize fine-grained relations between artifacts. Instead, they create coarse-grained representations of artifacts, mostly by combining all word embeddings of the resp.…”
Section: Flow Of Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their approach WQI uses the cosine similarity and a learning-to-rank technique. Chen et al [14] use document embeddings in combination with sequential semantics to incorporate sequential information as well. Their approach S2Trace is unsupervised.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, manual retrieval of traceability links can be error-prone [4] and timeconsuming. Therefore, automatic retrieval techniques that utilize tools such as information retrieval [5], ontology, machine learning [6], and deep learning [7] are often employed. Deep learning approaches can be classified into two main categories: supervised learning and unsupervised learning [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%