2013
DOI: 10.1364/oe.21.022566
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing the radiation efficiency of dye doped whispering gallery mode microresonators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(60 reference statements)
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Polystyrene microspheres with a nominal diameter (Ø) of 10.52 μm with a standard deviation (ΔØ) of 0.25 μm and a refractive index of 1.591 (Polysciences Inc., USA) were doped with a fluorescent laser dye (Nile Red, λ abs ~ 532 nm, λ em ~ 590 nm, Sigma Aldrich) using a liquid two phase system [10] . The fluorescent dye was first dissolved into xylene until the solubility limit was reached.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Polystyrene microspheres with a nominal diameter (Ø) of 10.52 μm with a standard deviation (ΔØ) of 0.25 μm and a refractive index of 1.591 (Polysciences Inc., USA) were doped with a fluorescent laser dye (Nile Red, λ abs ~ 532 nm, λ em ~ 590 nm, Sigma Aldrich) using a liquid two phase system [10] . The fluorescent dye was first dissolved into xylene until the solubility limit was reached.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the resonance wavelengths of the microcavity, the Purcell effect increases the emission rate of the gain medium [9] . As a consequence, the resulting WGM spectrum observable remotely in the far field shows up as a fluorescent signal modulated by sharp peaks corresponding to the microcavity resonances [10] . While this approach offers advantages in terms of practicality such as robustness of the coupling scheme, easy excitation and collection of the WGM modulated fluorescence, the Q factor observed for the radiation modes are often 3 or 4 orders of magnitude lower than those observed using the evanescent field coupling approach, eventually limiting the use of such a WGM excitation strategy in terms of resolution for sensing applications [11] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite the consideration of the three loss mechanisms, there remains a noticeable difference in the measured and predicted Q values (Q ~ 1000 [30] measured and Q ~ 2x10 5 predicted for a 15μm polystyrene sphere in water), as their individual contributions are not noticeable. This difference is though to be a result of one of the assumptions made in deriving the Chew model, namely that the resonator being considered is a perfect dielectric sphere.…”
Section: Quality Factormentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Fluorescent or active resonators are particularly interesting in this context as they allow remote excitation of the resonator, thereby alleviating some of the practical limitations of passive resonator configurations 9,[23][24][25] . Active resonators do display lower Q-factors 26 in comparison with passive resonators 27,28 , however, techniques exist that can facilitate in improving the Q-factor such as operating the resonator within the stimulated emission regime 29 or breaking the symmetry of the resonator by placing it onto the tip of a microstructured optical fiber (MOF) 30 . This second technique has the additional advantage of creating a robust and easy to use dip-sensing architecture 1 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%