2023
DOI: 10.1039/d3ta01806g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing the Marangoni flow by inner side chain engineering in nonfullerene acceptors for reproducible blade coating-processed organic solar cell manufacturing

Abstract: The industrial-scale, uniform film production of active layers is a prerequisite for high-performance, reproducible organic solar cells (OSCs), becoming a significant challenge. Blade coating, one of the most suitable protocols...

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…compared to the control device (Table 1). The poorer FF value (Figure 3c) of the ADT-treated device compared to the control device is mainly due to the lower hole mobility (μ h , 5.13×10 À 4 cm 2 V À 1 s À 1 vs. 7.23×10 À 4 cm 2 V À 1 s À 1 ) and electron mobility (μ e , 4.21×10 À 4 cm 2 V À 1 s À 1 vs. 4.56×10 À 4 cm 2 V À 1 s À 1 , as shown in Figure 3d) and the larger energy loss [42][43] (E loss , 0.555 eV vs. 0.535 eV, Figure S9 and Table S10 in the Supporting Information). Relative to the control device, the treatment of ADT had slight effect in exciton dissociation probability (P diss ), carrier lifetime (τ) and bimolecular and trap-assistant charge recombination (as shown in Figure S10 in the Supporting Information).…”
Section: Angewandte Chemiementioning
confidence: 91%
“…compared to the control device (Table 1). The poorer FF value (Figure 3c) of the ADT-treated device compared to the control device is mainly due to the lower hole mobility (μ h , 5.13×10 À 4 cm 2 V À 1 s À 1 vs. 7.23×10 À 4 cm 2 V À 1 s À 1 ) and electron mobility (μ e , 4.21×10 À 4 cm 2 V À 1 s À 1 vs. 4.56×10 À 4 cm 2 V À 1 s À 1 , as shown in Figure 3d) and the larger energy loss [42][43] (E loss , 0.555 eV vs. 0.535 eV, Figure S9 and Table S10 in the Supporting Information). Relative to the control device, the treatment of ADT had slight effect in exciton dissociation probability (P diss ), carrier lifetime (τ) and bimolecular and trap-assistant charge recombination (as shown in Figure S10 in the Supporting Information).…”
Section: Angewandte Chemiementioning
confidence: 91%
“…In general, the relationship between V oc and P light (illumination light intensity) is represented as V oc ∝ nKT / q ln­( P light ) (where q , T , and K are the elementary charge, thermodynamic temperature, and the Boltzmann constant, respectively) to investigate carrier recombination. It can be seen in Figure b that the slope of the PY-FBTA-based device is 1.13 kT / q , while that of the PY-DPP-based device is 1.32 kT / q , suggesting less trap-assisted and monomolecular recombination in the PY-FBTA-based devices. , The affinity between J sc and P light is given by the function J sc ∝ P light α . The PY-FBTA-based device presents a larger α value (0.988) than that of the PY-DPP-based device (0.945) (Figure c), which indicates that there is more suppressed bimolecular recombination in the devices based on PY-FBTA .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…It can be seen in Figure 7b that the slope of the PY-FBTA-based device is 1.13 kT/q, while that of the PY-DPP-based device is 1.32 kT/q, suggesting less trap-assisted and monomolecular recombination in the PY-FBTA-based devices. 55,56 The affinity between J sc and P light is given by the function J sc ∝ P light α . 57 The PY-FBTA-based device presents a larger α value (0.988) than that of the PY-DPP-based device (0.945) (Figure 7c), which indicates that there is more suppressed bimolecular recombination in the devices based on PY-FBTA.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second acceptors (guest acceptors) are almost as third component materials due to the good compatibility of the host donor and the host acceptor. 13 In contrast, it is more difficult to regulate the compatibility of the second donor and the host donor and coordinate the surface and bulk morphology of the ternary photoactive layer. Research on efficient ternary OPVs based on second donors as third component materials is summarized in Table 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the third component materials play the role of manipulating the morphology of ternary films, achieving a suitable phase-separated size scale (crystalline domains approach tens of nanometer scale) and creating an intertwined donor–acceptor bicontinuous network, resulting in efficient exciton dissociation and charge carrier transport within the ternary photoactive layer. The second acceptors (guest acceptors) are almost as third component materials due to the good compatibility of the host donor and the host acceptor . In contrast, it is more difficult to regulate the compatibility of the second donor and the host donor and coordinate the surface and bulk morphology of the ternary photoactive layer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%