2022
DOI: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13481.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing the implementation of the Making Every Contact Count brief behavioural intervention programme in Ireland: protocol for the Making MECC Work research programme

Abstract: Background: Brief behavioural interventions offered by healthcare professionals to target health behavioural risk factors (e.g. physical activity, diet, smoking and drug and alcohol use) can positively impact patient health outcomes. The Irish Health Service Executive (HSE) Making Every Contact Count (MECC) Programme supports healthcare professionals to offer patients brief opportunistic behavioural interventions during routine consultations. The potential for MECC to impact public health depends on its uptake… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To provide further evidence on the patient perspective of receiving opportunistic behaviour change interventions (Keyworth et al, 2020 ) and compare our findings with national and international studies collecting data to identify factors determining delivery of MECC from perspectives of HCPs and service users (Meade et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To provide further evidence on the patient perspective of receiving opportunistic behaviour change interventions (Keyworth et al, 2020 ) and compare our findings with national and international studies collecting data to identify factors determining delivery of MECC from perspectives of HCPs and service users (Meade et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current study addresses the following research needs: To understand barriers and facilitators beyond traditional implementation contexts, such as delivering MECC in a mental health setting (Harrison et al, 2022 ); To explore the feasibility of delivering MECC with client groups who may be facing an immediate crisis, or a complex or progressive diagnosis such a SMI (Deenik et al, 2019 ; Harrison et al, 2022 ); To understand whether tailored support offered through MECC is viewed favourably by services users and HCPs (Harrison et al, 2022 ; Lee et al, 2022 ); To contribute to the development of robust monitoring tools that facilitate measurement and attribution of behaviour change outcomes for MECC (Harrison et al, 2022 ); To provide further evidence on the patient perspective of receiving opportunistic behaviour change interventions (Keyworth et al, 2020 ) and compare our findings with national and international studies collecting data to identify factors determining delivery of MECC from perspectives of HCPs and service users (Meade et al, 2022 ). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We report our study according to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines (von Elm et al, 2007). All study materials and data are available at the ‘Making MECC Work’ Open Science Framework page (Meade et al, 2022b) https://osf.io/9a5vj/?view_only%3D50695e0be81e460e8de1c04dbd3c83e1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details of sample size assumptions and sample size calculations have been previously published (Meade et al, 2022a). All health care professionals who completed the online MECC eLearning training programme from June 2018–March 2021 ( n = 4050) were invited to take part in the online survey via an e‐mail invitation from the Health Service Executive MECC team on the 12th of April 2021.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation