2017
DOI: 10.1080/03043797.2017.1410523
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing the effectiveness of concept inventories using textual analysis: investigations in an electrical engineering subject

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By combining effective questioning and carefully designed distractors, these tests can assess students' understanding and identify misconceptions. Despite this, they are lacking in their ability to evaluate guessed selections, provide evidence for the cause or reasoning behind students' misconceptions or provide insight into the nature of students' understanding (Goncher & Boles, 2017).…”
Section: Automated Assessment Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By combining effective questioning and carefully designed distractors, these tests can assess students' understanding and identify misconceptions. Despite this, they are lacking in their ability to evaluate guessed selections, provide evidence for the cause or reasoning behind students' misconceptions or provide insight into the nature of students' understanding (Goncher & Boles, 2017).…”
Section: Automated Assessment Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The topics on the continuous time SSCI are background mathematics, linearity and time invariance (LTI), convolution, transform representations, and filtering. Despite their limitations [5], concept inventories are useful for testing a large number of students and comparing results across universities. Researchers typically give the 25-question SSCI in a pre/post-test format and calculate average gain statistics, <g> = 100 • post−pre 25−pre , to measure how many concepts students learn as a percentage of how many that they did not know before taking SS.…”
Section: Previous Research On Conceptual Understandingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CIs utilize multiple-choice questions (MCQs) and specifically designed response selections to help identify misconceptions. CI fail, however, to provide evidence of the causes of the misconceptions or the nature of student conceptual understanding [19]. Although MCQ-based CIs can measure student learning and understanding, they do not provide measures of higher-level thinking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been found that textual analysis on student written explanations can provide better judgements of their conceptual understanding. Goncher and Boles [19] described a framework to analyze assessment instruments that utilize textual, short-answer responses. However, their framework has not yet been tested for large sample sizes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%