2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0308-521x(01)00098-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing the adaptive capacity of the resource users in natural resource management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This means that construction work is not finalized at once, and can be adjusted according to experiences or issues in the scheme. Strengthening facilitated processes of engagement and learning at multiple levels could enhance the iterative cycle needed for the participatory design approach (Hagmann and Chuma 2002;Lefore 2015).…”
Section: The Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that construction work is not finalized at once, and can be adjusted according to experiences or issues in the scheme. Strengthening facilitated processes of engagement and learning at multiple levels could enhance the iterative cycle needed for the participatory design approach (Hagmann and Chuma 2002;Lefore 2015).…”
Section: The Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existence of uncertainty and surprise as well as their unpredictable nature (Funtowicz and Ravetz, 1993;Folke et al, 2003) requires a continuous learning process that attunes to new information by reformulating hypotheses and models, and understanding activity implementation as experiments (Westley, 2002;Hagmann and Chuma, 2002). For example, there could be different interpretations as to the cause of an animal disease such as calf scour, leading to different assumptions on how to best tackle the disease.…”
Section: Learning Through Experimenting and Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measures of adaptive capacity from various fields include livelihood diversification and mobility (Ellis 2000, Adger et al 2002), levels of social, cultural, economic, human, and natural capital (Berkes and Folke 1998, Carney 1998, Lemos et al 2013, institutional and governance processes and arrangements (Ostrom 1999, Armitage and Plummer 2011, Berman et al 2012), a culture of learning (Hagmann and Chuma 2002), redundancy of function in organizations (Staber and Sydow 2002), access to resources (Scoones 1998), diversity of resource dependence (Bailey and Pomeroy 1996), supportive public policies and institutions (Kalikoski et al 2010), leadership and resources (Hill 2013), and levels of income and social stability (O'Garra 2007). Adger (2003) argued that adaptive capacity is directly linked to social capital, which can be defined as relationships built on trust, networks, and reciprocity, and the resultant willingness and ability of groups to act collectively.…”
Section: Introduction and Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%