2023
DOI: 10.1002/smtd.202300519
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing Sulfur Redox Conversion of Active Iron Sites by Modulation of Electronic Density for Advanced Lithium‐Sulfur Battery

Abstract: Despite lithium‐sulfur (Li‐S) batteries possessing ultrahigh energy density as great promising energy storage devices, the suppressing shuttle effect and improving sulfur redox reaction (SROR) are vital for their practical application. Developing high‐activity electrocatalysts for enhancing the SROR kinetics is a major challenge for the application of Li‐S batteries. Herein, single‐molecule iron phthalocyanine species are anchored on the N and P dual‐doped porous carbon nanosheets (Fe‐NPPC) via axial Fe‐N coor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(92 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The electrolyte constitutes the maximum weight fraction of the LSBs, and the mass ratio of electrolyte to sulfur (E/S) represents the most important lever for changing the specific energy of the battery. [53,54] In this experiment, the WSYCS2@CF/S positive electrode with the same sulfur-loading of 12.5 mg cm −2 is used to perform a 0.1C cycle test after 0.05C pre-activation with an E/S ratio of 15, 10 and 5 μL mg −1 (Figure 5b). As the amount of electrolyte injected decreases, battery performance deteriorates.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electrolyte constitutes the maximum weight fraction of the LSBs, and the mass ratio of electrolyte to sulfur (E/S) represents the most important lever for changing the specific energy of the battery. [53,54] In this experiment, the WSYCS2@CF/S positive electrode with the same sulfur-loading of 12.5 mg cm −2 is used to perform a 0.1C cycle test after 0.05C pre-activation with an E/S ratio of 15, 10 and 5 μL mg −1 (Figure 5b). As the amount of electrolyte injected decreases, battery performance deteriorates.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, catalytic LiPS conversion of the discharge products (S/Li 2 S) has been demonstrated as an effective strategy to reduce the amount of LiPS in the electrolyte and further elevate the sulfur utilization of the cathode. For example, transition metal phosphides, such as FeP, CoP, MoP, and NiP, nanocatalysts; such as metal oxides and metal sulfides; and transition metal phthalocyanine compounds (M = Fe, Co, Cu, and Zn), have rendered excellent electrocatalytic properties in energy storage devices, thereby improving the overall utilization of sulfur. Therefore, it is extremely important to suppress the shuttle effect and improve the reaction kinetics of polysulfides to obtain high-performance LSBs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%