2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.tine.2015.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing statistical calculation with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to the left intra-parietal sulcus (IPS)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reported study results corroborate the first assumption because complex arithmetic operations thought to be solved using quantity manipulations were modulated by IPS TMS ( Andres et al, 2011 ; Salillas et al, 2012 ; Montefinese et al, 2017 ; Fresnoza et al, 2020 ), tDCS ( Hauser et al, 2013 ; Kasahara et al, 2013 ; Klein et al, 2013a , b ; Houser et al, 2014 , 2015 ; Artemenko et al, 2015 ) and high-frequency tRNS stimulation ( Pasqualotto, 2016 ; Popescu et al, 2016 ). TMS studies also hinted at the right IPS dominance for online calculation ( Salillas et al, 2012 ; Montefinese et al, 2017 ; Fresnoza et al, 2020 ), which might be explained by a disruption of not only the right-lateralized ventral spatial attention system in charge of automatic orienting but also the right component of the bilateral spatial attention system in charge of intentional orienting ( Corbetta and Shulman, 2002 ; Wassermann et al, 2008 ; Chica et al, 2011 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The reported study results corroborate the first assumption because complex arithmetic operations thought to be solved using quantity manipulations were modulated by IPS TMS ( Andres et al, 2011 ; Salillas et al, 2012 ; Montefinese et al, 2017 ; Fresnoza et al, 2020 ), tDCS ( Hauser et al, 2013 ; Kasahara et al, 2013 ; Klein et al, 2013a , b ; Houser et al, 2014 , 2015 ; Artemenko et al, 2015 ) and high-frequency tRNS stimulation ( Pasqualotto, 2016 ; Popescu et al, 2016 ). TMS studies also hinted at the right IPS dominance for online calculation ( Salillas et al, 2012 ; Montefinese et al, 2017 ; Fresnoza et al, 2020 ), which might be explained by a disruption of not only the right-lateralized ventral spatial attention system in charge of automatic orienting but also the right component of the bilateral spatial attention system in charge of intentional orienting ( Corbetta and Shulman, 2002 ; Wassermann et al, 2008 ; Chica et al, 2011 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Interestingly, for novel and complex subtractions, left parietal tDCS prevented characteristic prefrontal deactivations below the right prefrontal cathode as captured with simultaneous fMRI (Hauser et al 2016) and this configuration improved reaction times (Hauser et al 2013). In another paradigm, after viewing an instructional video, administering a complex statistical procedure was enhanced from left parietal anodal tDCS with a temporal cathode (Houser et al 2015), but not with placement of a prefrontal cathode (Houser et al 2014). Also considering neurodevelopmental studies, the accumulation of arithmetic proficiency may be accompanied by a shift from broad prefrontal to precise parietal activations (Zamarian et al 2009).…”
Section: Arithmetic Performance Modulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Channel 5 is located in the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and channel 31 is located in the left intraparietal sulcus (IPS). The involvement of the left IFG in arithmetic has been discussed in Case 1 and the activation of the left IPS in arithmetic has been reported in studies of Bugden et al (2012) and Houser et al (2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, the inferior prefrontal gyrus is activated in working memory processing while the fusiform gyrus is activated in number form decoding and building visuo-spatial representation of numerical quantity (Fias et al, 2013;Menon et al, 2020). In the study conducted by Zhao of Bugden et al (2012) and Houser et al (2015).…”
Section: Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicablementioning
confidence: 99%