2022
DOI: 10.3390/rs14030776
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing Spatial Resolution of SMAP Soil Moisture Products through Spatial Downscaling over a Large Watershed: A Case Study for the Susquehanna River Basin in the Northeastern United States

Abstract: Soil moisture (SM) with a high spatial resolution plays a paramount role in many local and regional hydrological and agricultural applications. The advent of L-band passive microwave satellites allowed for it to be possible to measure near-surface SM at a global scale compared to in situ measurements. However, their use is often limited because of their coarse spatial resolution. Aiming to address this limitation, random forest (RF) models are adopted to downscale the SMAP level-3 (L3SMP, 36 km) and SMAP enhan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
1
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…). This behavior is unexpected; typically, models are expected to perform better during dry periods, as demonstrated in numerous previous studies (Wakigari & Leconte, 2022). One possible explanation, reinforced by subsequent results, is that soil moisture distribution becomes more complex during dry periods as well as the inclusion of DEM derivatives in our work that have been demonstrated to be strong predictive factors of soil moisture at basin scale, especially in wet season (Raduła et al, 2018).…”
Section: Statistical Validation Of Downscaling Modelssupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…). This behavior is unexpected; typically, models are expected to perform better during dry periods, as demonstrated in numerous previous studies (Wakigari & Leconte, 2022). One possible explanation, reinforced by subsequent results, is that soil moisture distribution becomes more complex during dry periods as well as the inclusion of DEM derivatives in our work that have been demonstrated to be strong predictive factors of soil moisture at basin scale, especially in wet season (Raduła et al, 2018).…”
Section: Statistical Validation Of Downscaling Modelssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Unlike previous studies such as Abbaszadeh et al (2019) and Wakigari & Leconte (2022) that parameterized random forests using all available data for an entire study period, this study used approximately 1300 SMAP pixels within the study area. While this approach captures dynamic relationships between soil moisture and covariates, this strategy reduces the sample size used for training the daily models; posing the risk that the models may not have enough observations to effectively capture the relationships between covariates and soil moisture of the SMAP product.…”
Section: Methodological Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This might be because of the randomization and robustness of the RF algorithm that help the model avoid overfitting when even thousands of variables are given simultaneously. Moreover, the spatial aggregation of high-resolution predictors, such as VIs, WIs, Albedo, and LST, had a smoothing impact on the extreme values, resulting in the training of RF and ANN models with minimal extremes, as previously indicated by Wakigari et al [77]. However, this was not special to our work since existing downscaling approaches depend on calibration at a coarse spatial resolution as the initial step, making the aggregation of high spatial-resolution predictors inevitable.…”
Section: Models Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…RF is easy to work with and adaptable, and it is less sensitive to changes in hyperparameters than other models. It has been shown in previous studies that the RF model is capable of representing a workable SM downscaling model, and it has also been proved to be successful in complicated nonlinear fitting [34,49,50,53,76,77].…”
Section: Random Forest (Rf)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Berdasarkan profil kontur salinitas vertikal, bahwa salinitas di lapisan permukaan bertambah relatif kecil ke lapisan tengah dan begitu juga salinitas di lapisan dasar berkurang relatif kecil ke lapisan tengah sedangkan di lapisan tengah sendiri nilai salinitasnya berada diantara nilai salinitas di permukaan dan di dasar yang menandakan di lapisan tengah ini terjadi percampuran massa air tawar dan air asin. Sama seperti yang dilakukan Wakigari & Leconte (2022) di Sungai Susquehanna di Amerika Serikat bahwa estuari tercampur sebagian memiliki karakteristik utama yaitu nilai salinitasnya akan bervariasi di sepanjang muara maupun terhadap kedalaman dan nilai salinitas dari lapisan atas ke lapisan bawah memiliki nilai yang hampir seragam.…”
Section: Penentuan Kuantitatif Tipe Estuariunclassified