2020
DOI: 10.1111/hex.13167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing shared and surrogate decision making for people living with dementia: A systematic review of the effectiveness of interventions

Abstract: Background Dementia can have a profound impact on decision making. People living with dementia (PLwD) often need to make decisions about health care, and, as dementia progresses, decisions may need to be made on their behalf. Specific interventions may support this process. Review Question What interventions are effective in improving shared decision making or surrogate decision making on the health care of PLwD? Methods A narrative systemati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(119 reference statements)
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This article presents a novel decision aid to support family carers of people living with dementia towards the end‐of‐life. This is the first decision aid to cover multiple decisions that family carers may face when a person living with dementia is approaching the end‐of‐life, filling an important gap identified in the decision‐making literature 7,16,22 . This is one of the first papers to provide a detailed description of a systematic approach to coproducing a decision aid, grounded in theory, evidence and lived experience.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This article presents a novel decision aid to support family carers of people living with dementia towards the end‐of‐life. This is the first decision aid to cover multiple decisions that family carers may face when a person living with dementia is approaching the end‐of‐life, filling an important gap identified in the decision‐making literature 7,16,22 . This is one of the first papers to provide a detailed description of a systematic approach to coproducing a decision aid, grounded in theory, evidence and lived experience.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decision aids suitable for use by family carers in dementia care have been shown to improve knowledge and communication, and reduce decisional conflict among family carers 16,22 . However, these decision aids only focus on a single decision, including eating and feeding options, 23 place of care 24,25 and goals of care 26,27 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 37 ,44 This mirrors research seeking to find frameworks and approaches to standardize involvement. 19 , 21 Future work seeking to explore dementia friendly care therefore needs the frameworks informed by principles of social inclusion, shared decision making 11 , 12 and citizenship, 9 , 17 , 18 but also practical work to help practitioners know when initiatives are successful. 7 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way this review demonstrates ways that the basic and fundamental principles of human rights declarations can be applied to support the decision-making processes in assessing and implementing the care and support needs of individuals with dementia. Similarly, the review by Geddis-Regan et al 12 aimed to identify interventions to achieve shared decision making. They found limited examples relating to feeding decisions and advance care planning as well as studies that suggested techniques to enhance communication to enable shared decision making to occur.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A DA for proxy decision-makers could improve the decision-making process through helping the proxy determine what the person's preferences would be, and decision quality by ensuring that the choice made matches those preferences. As there is a lack of a DA for proxy decisions about research, and DAs are decision-speci c interventions that are unlikely to produce a bene t in other decision contexts [27], development of a decision-speci c intervention is needed. This paper describes the development of a novel intervention to support decision-making by family members when making decisions about research participation on behalf of a patient who lacks capacity to consent.…”
Section: Need For Decision Support Interventions For Proxy Decisions mentioning
confidence: 99%