2021
DOI: 10.1038/s43016-021-00406-6
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing science–policy interfaces for food systems transformation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings on feedback loop recommendations, which are the 'mechanisms' that allow the flow of information to create change in systems, demonstrates a relatively low number (n = 25) compared to 'system element and adjustment mechanism' recommendations (n = 204). As policy makers can often be unsure about how to integrate policies that support food systems transformation (Singh et al, 2021), this low acknowledgement of feedback loops in recommendation lists potentially contributes to the choosing of a lesser order of change option by policy makers seeking to limit unintended consequences and or the social and political backlash to substantial system change. For example, the overarching recommendation regarding research from the HLPE report 2020 states, "Encourage and support more research on FSN (food security and nutrition), key emerging issues and contentious areas" (HLPE 2020) and does not follow through with a directive in translating the evidence back into policy (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our findings on feedback loop recommendations, which are the 'mechanisms' that allow the flow of information to create change in systems, demonstrates a relatively low number (n = 25) compared to 'system element and adjustment mechanism' recommendations (n = 204). As policy makers can often be unsure about how to integrate policies that support food systems transformation (Singh et al, 2021), this low acknowledgement of feedback loops in recommendation lists potentially contributes to the choosing of a lesser order of change option by policy makers seeking to limit unintended consequences and or the social and political backlash to substantial system change. For example, the overarching recommendation regarding research from the HLPE report 2020 states, "Encourage and support more research on FSN (food security and nutrition), key emerging issues and contentious areas" (HLPE 2020) and does not follow through with a directive in translating the evidence back into policy (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Harmonized food consumption data at the individual level in Balkan region are the basis for improving the accuracy of exposure assessments, and support nutrition surveillance, diet- and health-related studies, longitudinal monitoring of the dietary patterns and nutrient intake, and evaluation of the dietary changes in the future period, nutrition epidemiology and public health nutrition, development of dietary guidelines, and evidence-based food and nutrition policy ( 59 ). The harmonized food consumption data from WBC can contribute to the international science-policy interfaces in the design of multi-sectoral and cross-scalar policies that combine food and nutrition security, public health, environmental sustainability, social well-being, and equity ( 60 ). The European Commission High-Level Expert Group (HLEG) to strengthen the International Platform for Food Systems Science (IPFSS) within the context of the 2021 UN Food Systems Summit for food systems transformation report stressed the needs for curated and standardized data on the global level for evidence-based policy making.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EU Green Deal is one of the most important examples at the EU level. At the global level, the sustainable development goals and objectives of the United Nations (US) Food System Summit are significant examples (Singh et al, 2021). The innovations generated and the speed with which these innovations reach the market depend on the irreversible costs and uncertainties related to a specific innovation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%