2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01261.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing Response Rates in Physician Surveys: The Limited Utility of Electronic Options

Abstract: Objective. To evaluate the utility of offering physicians electronic options as alternatives to completing mail questionnaires. Data Source. A survey of colorectal cancer screening practices of Alabama primary care physicians, conducted May-June 2010. Study Design. In the follow-up to a mail questionnaire, physicians were offered options of completing surveys by telephone, fax, email, or online. Data Collection Method. Detailed records were kept on the timing and mode of completion of surveys. Principal Findin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

6
32
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
6
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The response rate for this online provider survey was relatively low, although consistent with several studies using this strategy 2427 . The overall low response rate may have introduced bias as respondents may have already had strong interest in PrEP, thereby overestimating willingness to prescribe.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The response rate for this online provider survey was relatively low, although consistent with several studies using this strategy 2427 . The overall low response rate may have introduced bias as respondents may have already had strong interest in PrEP, thereby overestimating willingness to prescribe.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The study was limited to physicians with valid e-mail addresses listed in the AMA Physician Masterfile. Nonresponse bias is a concern, though the response rate is comparable with other studies using electronic physician surveys (28,41). Moreover, data were not available regarding demographic characteristics of the nonrespondents.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The strength of this study includes its high response rate (64.4%), which often is not attainable in physician surveys. [13,14] Our results clearly depict the current practice of registrars in the country, and perhaps the subregion. The limited numbers of senior registrars recruited in this survey may not be representative of the current practice of this cadre of residents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%