2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.pmr.2009.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing Quality of Life through Telerehabilitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
122
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 175 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
122
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is considerable support for the value of interventions delivered in the natural environment, ranging from addressing efficacy concerns by addressing problems of generalization, to increasing patient participation, including environmental context in rehabilitation, and increasing patient satisfaction. Rehabilitation training after stroke can achieve cross national network through this technology may improve the efficiency of patients' recovery [36,37].…”
Section: Strokementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is considerable support for the value of interventions delivered in the natural environment, ranging from addressing efficacy concerns by addressing problems of generalization, to increasing patient participation, including environmental context in rehabilitation, and increasing patient satisfaction. Rehabilitation training after stroke can achieve cross national network through this technology may improve the efficiency of patients' recovery [36,37].…”
Section: Strokementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Telerehabilitation is an emerging method of rehabilitation that consists of the remote delivery and monitoring of rehabilitation services (McCue, Fairman, & Pramuka, 2010) and has the potential to provide health care services to underserved areas with potential cost and travel savings (Chumbler et al, 2010;Gamble, Savage, & Icenogle, 2004). Several studies have supported the efficacy of telerehabilitation in facilitating motor recovery and activities of daily living (ADL) performance after stroke (Chumbler et al, 2012;Lum, Uswatte, Taub, Hardin, & Mark, 2006;Rogante, Grigioni, Cordella, & Giacomozzi, 2010); however, the research devoted to telerehabilitation and QOL outcomes has been limited.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What if we could develop costeffective robots that could be used both in acute rehabilitation hospitals and at home by patients so that they could continue their therapy? Telemedicine and telerehabilitation are gaining momentum, so it is not inconceivable that we could build remote monitoring and easy-to-use features into rehabilitation devices so that therapists could work with patients at home [4][5]. This would allow patients to continue their therapy beyond the typical number of sessions most healthcare systems currently allow and even motivate patients who know that their activities can be monitored remotely by their doctor and therapist.…”
Section: The Road Ahead For Rehabilitation Roboticsmentioning
confidence: 99%