2018
DOI: 10.1109/access.2017.2784840
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing PV Penetration in LV Networks Using Reactive Power Control and On Load Tap Changer With Existing Transformers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
38
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar result was also obtained for the distribution of sources determined from the particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm. These conclusions were confirmed in [5], in which various scenarios of source distribution in the network, different load and generation levels were considered. The reaction of the network was investigated when controlling the reactive power of the inverter, controlling the voltage in the MV/LV transformer with an on-load tap-changer and using both of these measures simultaneously.…”
Section: Voltage Control In the Transformer Oltcmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…A similar result was also obtained for the distribution of sources determined from the particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm. These conclusions were confirmed in [5], in which various scenarios of source distribution in the network, different load and generation levels were considered. The reaction of the network was investigated when controlling the reactive power of the inverter, controlling the voltage in the MV/LV transformer with an on-load tap-changer and using both of these measures simultaneously.…”
Section: Voltage Control In the Transformer Oltcmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…No-load tap-changing (NLTC) transformers comprise the vast majority of transformers in distribution networks with adjustable taps due to their low cost and large number [1,2]. Prior to the widespread increase in distributed energy resources (DERs), NLTC transformer taps have been set to boost the secondary voltage as the unadjusted voltage magnitude decreases with electrical distance from the substation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For LV levels, in practice, most utilities with a European-style network design use only the secondary distribution transformers equipped with off-load tap changers to control voltages. Once again, the use of both the traditional and novel MV volt/var control solutions mentioned above has been intensively proposed in the most current literature, but it is not applied in practice [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. The use of OLTC transformers in secondary distribution substations is currently the closest to realizing an LV reality [19,[32][33][34][35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the technology, two different methods of operating an OLTCST are possible: (1) a synchronized tap change among the three phases or (2) decoupled control [32]. Most previous works have dealt with uniform and common tap positions for all three phases of the MV/LV-controlled transformer (3P-OLTCST) [19][20][21]28,30,31,[33][34][35], but increasingly, more tap position settings among transformer phases are being proposed (1P-OLTCST) [24,25,29,32,36]. Decoupled control is obviously a great deal more attractive for LV networks because of their unbalanced nature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%