2012 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications 2012
DOI: 10.1109/percom.2012.6199861
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing privacy in participatory sensing applications with multidimensional data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, local privacy from the end user can ensure the consistency of the privacy guarantees when there are multiple accesses to users' data, in contrast to non-local privacy schemes that has to properly split and assign privacy budgets to different steps [5], [21], [35]. In existing work [15][12] [14], local privacy is implemented with randomized response technique [34]. However, the correlations and sparsity in high-dimensional data are not well considered, which will cause low scalability and utility for highdimensional data [25], [35].…”
Section: Privacy In Distributed Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, local privacy from the end user can ensure the consistency of the privacy guarantees when there are multiple accesses to users' data, in contrast to non-local privacy schemes that has to properly split and assign privacy budgets to different steps [5], [21], [35]. In existing work [15][12] [14], local privacy is implemented with randomized response technique [34]. However, the correlations and sparsity in high-dimensional data are not well considered, which will cause low scalability and utility for highdimensional data [25], [35].…”
Section: Privacy In Distributed Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the participants' privacy can still be easily inferred or identified due to the publication of crowdsourced data [15], [33], especially high-dimensional data, even though some existing privacy-preserving schemes and end-to-end encryption are used. The reasons for privacy leaks are two-fold:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Groat et al [10] consider multidimensional data to evaluate the user privacy, i.e., they consider spatio-temporal dimensions, the sensed data and more. But, they do not take into account the continuous data disclosure, which would be disastrous for the users in case of an attack on a multidimensional scale.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These two distributions span a significantly smaller range of utility, 0.786 to 0.802, which corresponds to 1.6% of the privacy metric. Since this effect on utility is so small, Groat et al [46] interpreted utility to be independent of the underlying distribution. This is a reasonable simplification because the number of categories and the number of participants have such a dominant effect on the metric's value.…”
Section: Experimental Study Of Trade-offs Between Privacy and Utilitymentioning
confidence: 99%