Enhancing Preservice Teachers’ Intention to Integrate Engineering through a Cross-Disciplinary Model

Cima, Francisco; Pazos, Pilar; Kidd, Jennifer; Gutierrez, Kristie; Ringleb, Stacie I.; Ayala, Orlando Barcia; Kaipa, Krishnanand N.

doi:10.7771/2157-9288.1338

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Many universities offer K-12 engineering outreach programs such as summer camps [1], afterschool clubs [2], in-class activities [3], printed brochures [4], and single-day on-campus visits [5] as ways to increase students' awareness of and interest in engineering. While many of these are short-term programs, longer-term outreach programs have been recommended, as students with sustained engineering exposure report greater long-term interest in engineering than students who participated in a week-long outreach program without additional engineering exposure [6].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of Summer Camp Recruitment Methods and Campers’ Perceptions of Engineering (Evaluation, Diversity)

Fleming,

Fernandez,

Julien

et al.

2023 ASEE Annual Conference &Amp; Exposition Proceedings

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Program leaders put a tremendous amount of thought into how they recruit students for engineering summer camps. Recruitment methods can include information sessions, established partnerships with school districts, and teacher or school counselor nominations of students. This study seeks to assess if the methods used to recruit students broaden participation or have any impact on students' perceptions of engineering. Two identical week-long summer camps were hosted by the University of Texas at Austin (UT Austin) in the summer of 2022. Camps were entirely free for all campers. A specific goal of the camp was to promote engineering as a career pathway for students from groups that have been historically excluded from STEM majors. Campers were rising 8 th and 9 th grade students in two cities near UT Austin; this age was intentionally identified as students who have sufficient STEM backgrounds to engage in meaningful engineering design challenges, and who are also at a critical inflection point with respect to decisions that put them on a trajectory to study engineering in college. Summer camp topics ranged from additive manufacturing to the chemical properties of water proofing, and students did activities such as constructing a prosthetic limb from recovered materials or designing an electronic dance game pad.In one camp session, students primarily found out about the camp by being nominated by counselors at their schools, with an intentional focus on recruiting students who might not otherwise be exposed to engineering. In the other camp session, parents signed up campers after hearing about the camp via information sent through the schools. All students who applied were accepted to the camps. Identical pre-and post-camp surveys asked campers questions about their knowledge of what engineers do, their interest in math and science, and what factors are important to them when choosing a career. Survey analysis showed that there were statistically significant differences in answers to questions between the groups in the pre-camp surveys, but post-camp surveys show that these differences disappeared after participating in the summer camp. Students whose parents directly enrolled them in the camp had higher pre-camp interest in science and technology; thus, counselor nominations may be a method to recruit students who might not have been interested in engineering had they not attended the camp. Additionally, prior to participating, campers recruited via counselor nominations had a narrower view of what engineers do than the parent-enrolled campers, but after camp the two groups had similar perceptions of what engineers do. The results of this study confirm literature findings regarding the importance of exposing young learners to engineering as a profession and broaden their views of opportunities in this field. The recruitment methods used for these camps show that nomination-based recruitment methods have the potential for greater impact on changing students' engineering trajectories.

show abstract