2017
DOI: 10.1109/tia.2017.2670525
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing Power Transformer Differential Protection to Improve Security and Dependability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…HV MCT Ratio or LV MCT Ratio = a = I sec ondary I primary (7) Referring to Figure 6a and using HV MCT Ratio, we can illustrate that upon the injection of balanced three phase nominal HV secondary current (0.35A) into corresponding relay current elements with no current injection into LV side relay current elements, current equal to 1A flows in secondary of HV MCT, resulting in flow of I di f f = 1 pu using Equation (5) and I bias = 0.5 pu using Equation (6). In Figure 6a, the phase shift of three phases is shown through clock convention, where 0 corresponds to 0 • , 4 corresponds to −120 • , and 8 corresponds to −240 • .…”
Section: Measurement Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…HV MCT Ratio or LV MCT Ratio = a = I sec ondary I primary (7) Referring to Figure 6a and using HV MCT Ratio, we can illustrate that upon the injection of balanced three phase nominal HV secondary current (0.35A) into corresponding relay current elements with no current injection into LV side relay current elements, current equal to 1A flows in secondary of HV MCT, resulting in flow of I di f f = 1 pu using Equation (5) and I bias = 0.5 pu using Equation (6). In Figure 6a, the phase shift of three phases is shown through clock convention, where 0 corresponds to 0 • , 4 corresponds to −120 • , and 8 corresponds to −240 • .…”
Section: Measurement Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors have used a software-based simulator that utilizes iterations for the determination of settings. Furthermore, enhancement techniques for power transformer differential protection are described in [7], in which the author also discussed internal and external fault cases for differential protection and conducted a simulation testing through real-time digital simulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The leakage flux fault detection strategies are classified into the vibration-based method (VBM) and search coil-based method (SCBM), and flux leakage-based methods; they were studied and compared. This modelling aims to achieve an FRA -The capacitive effect can be detected at high frequency -This method needs previous data on the transformer -This method needs complicated tools for detection -Offline method -Needs expert's opinion and sophisticated instruments [12,[16][17][18] Negative sequence -The signal for fault detection is available -Unable to locate the fault [19,20] Partial discharge -Well-established method in power utilities -This method is under the influence of tank and windings [21][22][23] Flux-based method -Precise and accurate -Exact fault location detection -Changes in the transformer structure -Models developed for verification purposes -Requires the details of the transformer structure and sensors [7,8,11,24] Voltage and current measurement -Models developed for verification purpose -Unable to locate the fault [9,25,26] Differential protection -Classical robust method -Online monitoring is possible -Unable to detect inter-turn faults at initial levels -Mainly depends on the precision of the current transformer -Sensitive to winding insulations breakdown -Sensitive to the structure of the transformer [27][28][29] Intelligent approach -Detect minute faults -Robust against missing data…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differential protection is enhanced in [29], with a classical and robust detection method. The approach however, is unable to detect interterm fault at inception level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%