2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2006.02.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing potential field data using filters based on the local phase

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
154
0
9

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 408 publications
(174 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
154
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…In Figure 1 we compare three filters, namely the total horizontal derivative (THDR, Cordell and Grauch, 1985), the normalized maximum horizontal gradient amplitude (TDX, Cooper and Cowan, 2006), and the tilt angle of the total horizontal gradient (TAHG, Ferreira et al, 2013), with the Signum transforms of the first and the second vertical derivative. We use a model composed of two dykes with a = 100 m (for both), and h = 100 m (left) and h = 500 m (right).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Figure 1 we compare three filters, namely the total horizontal derivative (THDR, Cordell and Grauch, 1985), the normalized maximum horizontal gradient amplitude (TDX, Cooper and Cowan, 2006), and the tilt angle of the total horizontal gradient (TAHG, Ferreira et al, 2013), with the Signum transforms of the first and the second vertical derivative. We use a model composed of two dykes with a = 100 m (for both), and h = 100 m (left) and h = 500 m (right).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years several such methods have been described which involve equalising the amplitudes of magnetic anomalies, by normalizing the derivatives of the field. For instances, the tilt derivative (Miller and Singh, 1994;Verduzco et al, 2004), the Theta map (Wijns et al, 2005) and the horizontal tilt derivative (TDX) (Cooper and Cowan, 2006). Recently, de Souza and Ferreira (2012) proposed a simple derivative-based method for qualitative and quantitative interpretation of magnetic anomalies from dykelike structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7(d) is simulated based on a 0.1 km regular grid, and the gradients of the synthetic model are derived according to the formulas that were proposed by Cooper (2006). We calculate the eigenvector v 1 , and then delineate the source centroids and outlines (Fig.…”
Section: Synthetic Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…data interpretation (Gordell 1989;Wijns et. al., 2005;Li 2006;Cooper and Cowan 2006;Foks 2013;Ma and Li 2012;Phillips 2015;).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3A). Tilt angle responses vary between positive values over the source, zero over or near the edge, and negative values outside the body (Cooper & Cowan, 2006). This sign variation is particularly useful when attempting to detect the relative contrast in magnetisation.…”
Section: New High-resolution Aeromagnetic Datamentioning
confidence: 99%