2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-1338-1_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing Postural Stability and Adaptability in Multiple Sclerosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies of action stability during whole-body movements have used a variety of methods applied to different patient populations and functional tasks including vertical posture (Hausdorff et al 1985; Cavanaugh et al 2005; Riva et al 2013; van Emmerik et al 2014). Studies of patients with postural disorders explored analysis of postural sway during quiet standing (Visser et al 2008), postural preparation to self-initiated action (King et al 2010; Rogers et al 2011), and responses to unexpected postural perturbations (Boonstra et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of action stability during whole-body movements have used a variety of methods applied to different patient populations and functional tasks including vertical posture (Hausdorff et al 1985; Cavanaugh et al 2005; Riva et al 2013; van Emmerik et al 2014). Studies of patients with postural disorders explored analysis of postural sway during quiet standing (Visser et al 2008), postural preparation to self-initiated action (King et al 2010; Rogers et al 2011), and responses to unexpected postural perturbations (Boonstra et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was followed by using eligible criteria to exclude 34 articles due to the following reasons: irrelevant topic (n = 12), abstract (n = 4), review articles (n = 7), and no TC intervention (n = 11). Ten studies were finally considered eligible for full-text critical appraisal, including seven experimental studies (two randomized controlled design [ 31 , 32 ] and five quasi-experimental design [ 19 21 , 33 , 34 ]) and three observational studies (-posttest design [ 35 – 37 ]). The inter-rater reliability for the selection of the eligible studies was 83.3%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, the low overall study quality within the experimental studies is mainly attributed to the following reasons such as selection bias (non-randomized, unconcealed assignment), performance bias (absence of blinding of therapist), measurement bias (absence of blinding of participants and assessor), and attrition bias (lacking intention-to-treat analysis). With regard to the study quality assessment for three observational studies with pretest-posttest design, although one study with high quality [ 36 ] and two other studies with acceptable quality [ 35 , 37 ] were presented, all three studies lacked large sample size [ 35 – 37 ]; two studies lacked blinding of outcome assessor [ 35 , 37 ]; one study did not meet the requirement of “group-level interventions and individual-level outcome efforts” [ 35 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations