2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-60503-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing performance of berseem clover genotypes with better harvesting management through farmers’ participatory research at smallholder farms in Punjab

Abstract: A field study was conducted on smallholder farmer fields between 2012 to 2014 to evaluate the performance of cv. Agaitti Berseem-2002, against local landraces exchanged between farmers (LBF1) or available from local markets (LBM1). The effects of genotype and harvesting regimen on forage production, quality and seed production were evaluated. Significant differences (P < 0.05) among genotypes and cutting treatments were recorded for forage and seed yields, and forage quality across all research sites in both y… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the study of Vaswani, et al (2016) the crude protein of Corn forage HTHM 5101, DHM 117 and HM variety were 8.39%, 6.56% and 7.09% respectively. In the study of Tufail et al, (2020) There were significant variations for green forage energy among the maize genotypes (Table 4). According to Ruswandi and Syafi'I (2016) each genotype has different character in responding to their environment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In the study of Vaswani, et al (2016) the crude protein of Corn forage HTHM 5101, DHM 117 and HM variety were 8.39%, 6.56% and 7.09% respectively. In the study of Tufail et al, (2020) There were significant variations for green forage energy among the maize genotypes (Table 4). According to Ruswandi and Syafi'I (2016) each genotype has different character in responding to their environment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The overall improvement of forage quality in mixtures vs. the cereal monoculture was particularly evident in Swift Current during the very dry conditions of 2017, which might indicate that annual forage mixtures might be a useful crop management option to provide higher quality forage under stressful growing conditions. In addition, the improved forage quality in mixtures could also lead to greater potential market value and improve animal performance in beef, dairy, and sheep production systems (Buza et al, 2014;McKenzie et al, 2017;Fruet et al, 2019;Tufail et al, 2020).…”
Section: Diversified Cover Crop Mixtures Increased Forage Quality Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its production is low (3354 t/ha) in Pakistan as compared to other countries. Poor agronomic methods, unavailability of well-adapted seed varieties and timely input are some important factors that contribute to low production (Anwar et al 2012; Tufail et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%