2007
DOI: 10.1080/10503300600702331
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing outcome for potential treatment failures: Therapist–client feedback and clinical support tools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
225
3
6

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 238 publications
(241 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
6
225
3
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In these studies therapists directly recruited the patients, which may have increased participation rates. However, other studies have used similar recruitment procedures to our study [9][10][11][12][13][14]. They have achieved higher participation rates than in our study possibly because the OQ-45 was a standard tool for all patients in those studies.…”
Section: Limitationscontrasting
confidence: 40%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In these studies therapists directly recruited the patients, which may have increased participation rates. However, other studies have used similar recruitment procedures to our study [9][10][11][12][13][14]. They have achieved higher participation rates than in our study possibly because the OQ-45 was a standard tool for all patients in those studies.…”
Section: Limitationscontrasting
confidence: 40%
“…A recent meta-and mega-analytic review [8] of data from six large studies [9][10][11][12][13][14] reported that different feedback procedures were effective in enhancing treatment outcome, especially for those patients at risk of treatment failure. A total of 6,151 subjects were included and, of these, 1,382 (22%) were at risk of treatment failure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of client feedback not only integrates evidence-based practices in order to better prepare counselors, it also promotes developmental growth in light of the current professional challenges and therefore appears essential to meet the high demands of practicing counselors (Harmon et al, 2007;Hawkins, Lambert, Vermeersch, Slade, & Tuttle, 2004;Miller, et al, 2005). Counselor educators' goal to promote student development requires real data not student assumptions, and on-site supervisors' goal to assure premium client care and client retention requires concrete evidence, not personal perception (Lambert & Hawkins, 2001).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This type of realtime data enables practitioners to better inform their treatment, discuss progress or lack thereof with the client, and inform the process of supervision (Lambert & Hawkins, 2001). Researchers measuring the incorporation of these mechanisms by counselors and psychologists have found them to be a statistically significant predictor of positive client change (Harmon, et al, 2007).…”
Section: Client Feedback In Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Si bien la retroalimentación no parece mostrar un efecto beneficioso adicional en los resultados para los pacientes que ya están respondiendo bien a la terapia (es decir, pacientes encarrilados), los estudios podrían encontrar efectos beneficiosos en los resultados para los pacientes que no muestran un buen progreso o presentan un alto riesgo de deterioro (los denominados casos "mal encarrilados", por ejemplo, Crits-Christoph et al, 2012;Gondek, Edbrooke-Childs, Fink, Deighton y Wolpert, 2016;Harmon et al, 2007;Probst et al , 2013). Los tamaños del efecto medio informados para pacientes "mal encarrilados" con el uso de técni-cas de retroalimentación versus tratamiento habitual (TH) varían desde pequeños (g = .10; Knaup, Koesters, Schoefer, Becker y Puschner, 2009) hasta medios (g = .53; Shimokawa et al, 2010).…”
unclassified