2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2018.04.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing membrane performance in removal of hazardous VOCs from water by modified fluorinated PVDF porous material

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The highest efficiency (19 L/m 2 h) was achieved for the SMD7 module with the ECTFE membranes having the wall thickness of 170 µm and 0.4 µm pore size, whereas the lowest permeate flux (6.7 L/m 2 h) was obtained for PP membranes with the wall thickness of 1500 µm and 0.2 µm pore size. The results obtained for the membranes with similar capillary diameters and wall thickness ( Table 1, SMD5 and SMD9) indicated that a slightly larger value of the permeate flux may result from a higher porosity and larger pore size [53,54]. For similar reasons the efficiency of the SMD7 module was higher than that obtained for the SMD8 module with PV370 membranes, which had the smallest pore diameters (0.1 µm) ( Table 1).…”
Section: The Effect Of Membrane Morphologymentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The highest efficiency (19 L/m 2 h) was achieved for the SMD7 module with the ECTFE membranes having the wall thickness of 170 µm and 0.4 µm pore size, whereas the lowest permeate flux (6.7 L/m 2 h) was obtained for PP membranes with the wall thickness of 1500 µm and 0.2 µm pore size. The results obtained for the membranes with similar capillary diameters and wall thickness ( Table 1, SMD5 and SMD9) indicated that a slightly larger value of the permeate flux may result from a higher porosity and larger pore size [53,54]. For similar reasons the efficiency of the SMD7 module was higher than that obtained for the SMD8 module with PV370 membranes, which had the smallest pore diameters (0.1 µm) ( Table 1).…”
Section: The Effect Of Membrane Morphologymentioning
confidence: 75%
“…That observation was in good accordance with the previous results of PVDF treatment with the piranha reagent. 27 The activation process also influenced the membrane roughness and pore size of the material ( Table 1 and Figures S4, S5 ). An increase of roughness from 85 to 110 nm was noticed.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding is in good agreement with the literature, showing that during the modification process, the hydroxyl groups can remain unused mostly owing to the steric effect of modifiers and limited access to the inorganic substrate. 27 , 40 It was essential to observe an intensive peak at 2274 cm –1 ensuring that isocyanate groups were not used and are available for further modification.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The separation and purification of dairy products can be accomplished with high effectiveness by implementing pressure-driven membrane technologies. However, there is a necessity to apply high-pressure differences across the membrane (e.g., ultrafiltration-UF or nanofiltration-NF) (Al-Gharabli et al 2018;Chenchaiah et al 2013;Christensen et al 2006;Qtaishat and Banat 2013;Zaragoza et al 2014), which generates high cost of the process, usually smaller in the case of microfiltration (MF) process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the solutions is to employ a membrane distillation (MD) process (Al-Gharabli et al 2018;Chenchaiah et al 2013) instead of ultra-or microfiltration. MD is a thermally driven membrane process performing at low feed temperatures comparing to the conventional distillation processes permitting to use the waste heat from industrial systems or even solar energy (Qtaishat and Banat 2013;Zaragoza et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%