2017
DOI: 10.1093/petrology/egx056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing Maficity of Granitic Magma during Anatexis: Entrainment of Infertile Mafic Lithologies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As discussed Nicoli and Dyck (), the origin of S‐type granite is considerably more complex and involves multiple superimposing processes that modify the anatectic melt after its generation. These include mixing with other magmas (Schwindinger & Weinberg, ), variable entrainment of residual solids (Carvalho, Sawyer, & Janasi, ; Garcia‐Arias & Stevens, ; Milord, Sawyer, & Brown, ) and differentiation due to solidification and assimilation during migration. These limitations make direct comparison to natural magmatic rocks complex; however, the calculated melt compositions are reasonable approximation to those produced in nature (Cesare, Acosta‐Vigil, Bartoli, & Ferrero, ; White, Stevens, & Johnson, ), and the results here demonstrate that modelling allows insights into the general effects of water‐fluxed melting on melt and residual compositions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As discussed Nicoli and Dyck (), the origin of S‐type granite is considerably more complex and involves multiple superimposing processes that modify the anatectic melt after its generation. These include mixing with other magmas (Schwindinger & Weinberg, ), variable entrainment of residual solids (Carvalho, Sawyer, & Janasi, ; Garcia‐Arias & Stevens, ; Milord, Sawyer, & Brown, ) and differentiation due to solidification and assimilation during migration. These limitations make direct comparison to natural magmatic rocks complex; however, the calculated melt compositions are reasonable approximation to those produced in nature (Cesare, Acosta‐Vigil, Bartoli, & Ferrero, ; White, Stevens, & Johnson, ), and the results here demonstrate that modelling allows insights into the general effects of water‐fluxed melting on melt and residual compositions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the scale of an anatectic section of the crust, these melts are likely to blend with each other during migration, before crystallizing (Diener, White, & Hudson, ; Schwindinger & Weinberg, ). In addition, numerous other mechanisms further modify their composition, such as fractionation (Garcia‐Arias & Stevens, ), disequilibrium partial melting (Madlakana & Stevens ; Nicoli, Stevens, Moyen, Vezinet, & Mayne, ), entrainment of peritectic minerals (Stevens, Villaros, & Moyen, ) or of residual and infertile lithologies (Carvalho et al., ), masking a clean signal of either water‐present or water‐absent melting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other commonly reported type of selvedge is also rich in biotite, but occurs as a much wider (up to 10 cm) and compositionally zoned rim between diatexite (melt‐rich part) and schollen within it. Mafic schollen are prone to developing this kind of selvedge (Troll & Winter, ; Carvalho, Sawyer, & Janasi, ; this study), but they also develop around schollen of marble (Figure a–d), calcsilicate, pelitic gneiss (Rocha, Moraes, Möller, Cioffi, & Jercinovic, ) and residual (Johannes, Ehlers, Kriegsman, & Mengel, ) bulk compositions. Troll and Winter () examined the composition of biotite in such a selvedge and attributed its growth to reactions and chemical exchanges between the mafic schollen and surrounding melt‐rich diatexite.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The reaction selvedges are biotite factories and sequester K 2 O and H 2 O. In a crustal melting context, erosion of reaction selvedges can be added to the growing list of processes that increase the maficity (Carvalho et al, 2017;Clemens, Stevens, & Farina, 2011) of felsic magmas.…”
Section: Recycling Of Mafic Selvedges In the Diatexitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tabela 7-6: Histograma parcial da Figura 7.10 indicando as idades 207 Pb/ 206 Pb paleoproterozoicas obtidas em zircão detrítico da Unidade Serra do Ibituruna e os intervalos de idades U-Pb em zircão disponíveis na literatura para as prováveis áreas fontes. Referências: 1- Barbosa et al 2015;2-Seixas et al, 2013;3-Teixeira et al, 2014;4-Ávila et al, 2006;5-Teixeira et al, 2008;6-Ávila et al, 2010;7-Ávila et al, 2014;8-Teixeira et al, 2015;9-Seixas et al, 2012;10-Oliveira, 2004;11-Carvalho et al, 2017a;12-Lopes, 2013;13-Gengo et Os padrões de enriquecimento em ETR planos observados em cristais de zircão neoarqueano podem ser compatíveis com zircão do Gnaisse Candeias, que tem composição enderbítica (Oliveira, 2004), do ortopiroxêniobiotita granodiorito Santo Antônio do Amparo (Campos, 2004), ambos do Complexo Passa Tempo, e de schollens em meio ao migmatitos Kinawa, que podem apresentar clinopiroxênio + hornblenda + plagioclásio (Carvalho et al, 2017b).…”
Section: Prováveis áReas Fonteunclassified