2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.10.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing image resolution of soils by stochastic multiscale image fusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, different tillage systems lead to characteristically formed pores (Pires et al, 2017; Pires, Roque, Rosa, & Mooney, 2019). Using a hierarchical sampling scheme and combining the information from images from different sample sizes and resolution to derive a complete description of multiscale heterogeneity (Bacq‐Labreuil et al, 2018; Dal Ferro, Sartori, Simonetti, Berti, & Morari, 2014; Karsanina, Gerke, Skvortsova, Ivanov, & Mallants, 2018; Leuther, Schlüter, Wallach, & Vogel, 2019; Schlüter et al, 2018; Schlüter, Weller, & Vogel, 2011; Vogel, Weller, & Schlüter, 2010). By merging the pore size distribution (PSD) of several sample sizes (Vogel et al, 2010) a joint pore size distribution can be created while increasing the size range of visible porosity (ϕ‐vis).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, different tillage systems lead to characteristically formed pores (Pires et al, 2017; Pires, Roque, Rosa, & Mooney, 2019). Using a hierarchical sampling scheme and combining the information from images from different sample sizes and resolution to derive a complete description of multiscale heterogeneity (Bacq‐Labreuil et al, 2018; Dal Ferro, Sartori, Simonetti, Berti, & Morari, 2014; Karsanina, Gerke, Skvortsova, Ivanov, & Mallants, 2018; Leuther, Schlüter, Wallach, & Vogel, 2019; Schlüter et al, 2018; Schlüter, Weller, & Vogel, 2011; Vogel, Weller, & Schlüter, 2010). By merging the pore size distribution (PSD) of several sample sizes (Vogel et al, 2010) a joint pore size distribution can be created while increasing the size range of visible porosity (ϕ‐vis).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, such multiscale models can be obtained through the superimposition of low and high resolution 2D images or 3D volumes. These 2D images are then obtained by extrapolating high resolution structures to larger images through two-point correlation functions and simulated annealing [57][58][59][60][61]. 3D volumes can be obtained from 2D images through process-reconstruction [62], two-point statistical relations [63,64], simulated annealing [59,65], phase recovery [66,67], and multiple point geostatistics [68][69][70][71][72].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this is challenging in practice because of the inherent limitations of MCT. More specifically, a trade-off should be made between the FOV and resolution of MCT images [5,6]. Actually, rock MCT images with a large FOV are typically of low resolution (LR), which causes increased difficulty of property analysis as many fine structures (e.g., pores) cannot be captured.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%