Enhancing GSS-based Requirements Negotiation with Distributed and Mobile Tools

Seyff, Norbert; Hoyer, Christoph; Kroiher, E.; Grünbacher, Paul

doi:10.1109/wetice.2005.34

Cited by 10 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Applying EasyWinWin, stakeholders move through a step-bystep negotiation, they collect, elaborate, prioritise and negotiate requirements to come up with agreements. An EasyWin-Win workshop is facilitated by a moderator and often supported with tools [31,33]. The critical steps of EasyWinWin are: A more detailed description of these steps can be found in [31].…”

Section: Tailoring the Winwin Negotiation Model To Sustainabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Tailoring Requirements Negotiation to Sustainability

Seyff

Betz

Duboc

et al. 2018

2018 IEEE 26th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Requirements Engineering (RE) plays a critical role in software system development and is argued to be the key leverage point for practitioners who want to design sustainable software-intensive systems. However, existing RE methods and tools do not explicitly facilitate the discussion and negotiation of sustainability-related concerns. This leads to insufficient or onedimensional perceptions of sustainability. In this paper, we discuss our understanding of sustainability and its relationship with requirements. Based on the outcomes of this discussion, we have extended the WinWin Negotiation Model by incorporating sustainability concepts so that the negotiation also includes the ability to consider the impact of requirements on sustainability. Applying this negotiation method in an exploratory industrial case study, we have learned that this approach stimulates the discussion on sustainability and its multiple dimensions. It also allows practitioners to reflect on requirements and their effects on sustainability. However, we have also observed that further in-depth requirements analysis is needed to analyse the long-term effects of requirements regarding sustainability.

show abstract

Section: Tailoring the Winwin Negotiation Model To Sustainabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Tailoring Requirements Negotiation to Sustainability

Seyff

Betz

Duboc

et al. 2018

2018 IEEE 26th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…ARENA (Anytime, Anyplace Requirements Negotiation Aids) is a web-based tool which, at least partially, transfers the EWW method to a distributed context (Geisser et al 2007). A major limitation is that this tool only supports asynchronous work as it completely replaces the original EWW groupware (Seyff et al 2005). Moreover, it is not possible to integrate external applications into ARENA due to missing interfaces and specific requirements of EWW meetings .…”

Section: Existing Re Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reverse Presentations

Wiener

Stephan

2010

Bus Inf Syst Eng

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Requirements engineering is frequently cited as one of the most critical stages in software development. In an offshore setting, this criticality is even increased by distance challenges. The paper presents a client-oriented method for requirements validation in offshore software development. The method aims at creating a common understanding of the future system by means of "reverse presentations". This core element of the method facilitates the transfer of knowledge across social worlds for the purpose of validation. Case studies confirm the method's fit with the offshore context as well as its positive impact on the inter-organizational interaction and control.

show abstract

“…Die Methode versucht durch die Entwicklung einer gemeinsamen Vision und die Schaffung von Win-Win-Situationen einen grundsätzlichen Konsens unter allen Beteiligten zu erreichen. Dieses Werkzeug ermöglicht allerdings ausschließlich asynchrones Arbeiten, weil es die EWW-Groupware vollständig ersetzt (Seyff et al 2005). Ein Nachteil von EWW ist ihr Fokus auf eine RE-Phase und ihre fehlende Integration in den Gesamtprozess (Geisser u. Hildenbrand 2006).…”

Section: Bestehende Re-methodenunclassified

Reverse Presentations

Wiener

Stephan

2010

WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Eine kundenorientierte Methode zur Anforderungsvalidierung in der Offshore-SoftwareentwicklungDas Requirements Engineering wird vielfach als eine der kritischsten Phasen der Softwareentwicklung bezeichnet. Diese Kritikalität wird durch offshore-spezifische Herausforderungen noch erhöht. Der Artikel stellt eine kundenorientierte Methode zur Anforderungsvalidierung in der Offshore-Softwareentwicklung vor. Die Methode zielt darauf ab, mithilfe von "Reverse Presentations" ein gemeinsames Verständnis des zukünftigen Softwaresystems zu schaffen. Dieses Kernelement der Methode vereinfacht den Wissenstransfer zwischen "sozialen Welten" zu Validierungszwecken. Fallstudien mit deutschsprachigen Kunden bestätigen die Eignung der Methode für den Offshore-Kontext sowie deren positiven Einfluss auf die interorganisationale Interaktion und Kontrolle.

show abstract

Enhancing GSS-based Requirements Negotiation with Distributed and Mobile Tools

Cited by 10 publications

References 3 publications

Tailoring Requirements Negotiation to Sustainability

Tailoring Requirements Negotiation to Sustainability

Reverse Presentations

Reverse Presentations

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About