2008
DOI: 10.1124/mol.107.044651
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing Drug Accumulation inSaccharomyces cerevisiaeby Repression of Pleiotropic Drug Resistance Genes with Chimeric Transcription Repressors

Abstract: Yeast is a powerful model system for studying the action of small-molecule therapeutics. An important limitation has been low efficacy of many small molecules in yeast due to limited intracellular accumulation. We used the DNA binding domain of the pleiotropic drug resistance regulator pleiotropic drug resistance 1 (Pdr1) fused in-frame to transcription repressors to repress Pdr1-regulated genes. Expression of these chimeric regulators conferred dominant enhancement of sensitivity to a different class of compo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1 and 2 show that KP1019 exerts both cytotoxic and cytostatic effects on yeast. Although the concentration of KP1019 that kills approximately 50% of wild-type yeast (163mg/ml or 273mM) is somewhat higher than the IC 50 values (56-179mM) reported for cancer cells in vitro (Heffeter et al, 2005;Heffeter et al, 2010), this result is not surprising given that yeast often display higher levels of resistance to antineoplastic agents (Stepanov et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 43%
“…1 and 2 show that KP1019 exerts both cytotoxic and cytostatic effects on yeast. Although the concentration of KP1019 that kills approximately 50% of wild-type yeast (163mg/ml or 273mM) is somewhat higher than the IC 50 values (56-179mM) reported for cancer cells in vitro (Heffeter et al, 2005;Heffeter et al, 2010), this result is not surprising given that yeast often display higher levels of resistance to antineoplastic agents (Stepanov et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 43%
“…(F and G)The frequency of dynein localization to either microtubule plus ends, the cell cortex, or spindle pole bodies (SPBs) is plotted for indicated strains and drug treatment (for mitotic cells only). In addition to the indicated alleles and drug treatment, the plot in panel G depicts cells that possess the prd1-DBD-CYC8 allele, which represses transcription of pleiotropic drug resistance genes91 , thus promoting intracellular retention of MG132.These cells were treated with 75 ”M MG132 for 1.5 hours prior to imaging (control cells were treated with an equal volume of DMSO). Each data point represents the weighted mean ± weighted standard error (73 to 107 mitotic cells from two independent experiments were analyzed for each strain).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the known in vitro telomerase inhibitor, BIBR1532 (Figures 3A and S2F), had no effect upon the growth of control strains or yeast expressing human telomerase (Figure 2F). Furthermore, in a hyperpermeable strain, pdr1 DBD -cyc8 (Stepanov et al., 2008), BIBR1532 was toxic (Figure S2G).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%