2020
DOI: 10.1109/tsg.2019.2953716
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing Distribution System Resilience With Proactive Islanding and RCS-Based Fast Fault Isolation and Service Restoration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With this in mind, a few researchers have recently proposed some approaches to address this problem. In [38][39][40], a few comprehensive resilience-oriented FLISR methods were presented for service restoration under extreme event. Since the resilience-based FLISR methods are based on centralized and mathematical optimization, they have inherent defects in single point failure and self-healing speed.…”
Section: B Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With this in mind, a few researchers have recently proposed some approaches to address this problem. In [38][39][40], a few comprehensive resilience-oriented FLISR methods were presented for service restoration under extreme event. Since the resilience-based FLISR methods are based on centralized and mathematical optimization, they have inherent defects in single point failure and self-healing speed.…”
Section: B Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) This paper presents an integrated multistage strategy on the basis of multistage characteristics of self-healing control, which decomposes the complex self-healing problem into simpler phased sub-problems and is collaboratively addressed by different algorithms at different stages, different from previously heuristic-rule-based [27,36], expert-rule-based [29], graph-theory-based [37], multistate-based [17][18][19] FDMAS or centralized service restoration methods and centralized resilience-based [38][39][40], DMAS-based [41][42][43] FLISR approaches.…”
Section: Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One can recall all aspects of the model: contingency, fragility, restoration, and functionality; which are achieved in different ways. Works in [127,128,136,137,139] suggest using simulation-based frameworks to implement the quantification procedure, while [123,124,131,135,138] opt for complete analytical formulation. A good compromise is found in [122,125,126,132,133] with a hybrid analytical-simulation modeling, for example [133] where the functional model is experimental, and remaining contingency, fragility, and restoration models are posed as optimization problems.…”
Section: Performance Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Authors in [134] assume a probability distribution for uncertain parameters in their resource allocation optimization problem (event parameters and resource allocation effectiveness parameters), by modifying the objective to the expected value of resilience. Likewise, in [135] a stochastic scenario-based optimization is adopted to cope with event uncertainties. However, for deep uncertain events, little to no data are available, turning interest toward robust optimization in both [132] for multi-stage and multi-zone natural hazard, and [138] for load and renewable generation.…”
Section: Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation