2016
DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2016.308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing Diagnostic Performance of Symptom-Based Criteria for Irritable Bowel Syndrome by Additional History and Limited Diagnostic Evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
52
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Symptom-based criteria to diagnose specific FGIDs and rule out organic disease have limited value but there is circumstantial evidence that specific features of the patient history, and a limited diagnostic evaluation that may include calprotectin or C-reactive protein may substantially improve the sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative likelihood ratios 46. Recent studies have suggested that biomarkers might be useful to categorise FGID cohorts.…”
Section: Role Of Patient History and Biomarkers To Augment Future Catmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Symptom-based criteria to diagnose specific FGIDs and rule out organic disease have limited value but there is circumstantial evidence that specific features of the patient history, and a limited diagnostic evaluation that may include calprotectin or C-reactive protein may substantially improve the sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative likelihood ratios 46. Recent studies have suggested that biomarkers might be useful to categorise FGID cohorts.…”
Section: Role Of Patient History and Biomarkers To Augment Future Catmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discriminatory accuracy of the two models, as measured by the AUC, were good at 0.77 and 0.79 for the Canadian and UK models respectively. This compares with positive LRs of 3.35–3.87 in two previous validation studies of the Rome III criteria, which was enhanced to over 7 by incorporating various combinations of levels of somatic symptom reporting, absence of nocturnal stool passage, and normal blood results in one of these studies …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The prevalence of IBS in the UK study, as defined by the reference standard, was 27.5% ( n = 99). Compared with those who did not undergo colonoscopy, patients undergoing colonoscopy had a higher BMI, but there were no other significant differences between the two groups, including the number of patients who had IBS according to the latent class model [94 (26.1%) of 360 patients colonoscoped, vs. 147 (22.9%) of 642 not colonoscoped, P = 0.29].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations