2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.exis.2020.07.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing corporate standing, shifting blame: An examination of Canada's Extractive Sector Transparency Measures Act

Abstract: Highlights Canada's Extractive Sector Transparency Measures act (ESTMA) - passed into law in 2014 - made Canada compliant with the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative and created legislation comparable to transparency directives in the EU and USA. Consideration of Tahoe Resources/Goldcorp, De beers and Africa Oil Corporation financial reporting for the ESTMA. Lack of reporting oversight leaves monitoring and review of incomplete information to ci… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…EIs are commonly criticized for a lack of standardization of accounting and reporting (Luther, 1996; Gray et al , 2019), which suggests the fragility of the green network in sustainability reporting in EIs, as well as explaining why sustainability goals are challenging in this sector. Ciupa and Zalik (2020) argue that limited standardization in reporting among Canadian firms has resulted in difficulties in evaluating results across divergent spatial and national contexts or in comparing between the kinds of payments that firms make to national or local governments.…”
Section: Accounting Infrastructure and Promissory Sustainable Extract...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EIs are commonly criticized for a lack of standardization of accounting and reporting (Luther, 1996; Gray et al , 2019), which suggests the fragility of the green network in sustainability reporting in EIs, as well as explaining why sustainability goals are challenging in this sector. Ciupa and Zalik (2020) argue that limited standardization in reporting among Canadian firms has resulted in difficulties in evaluating results across divergent spatial and national contexts or in comparing between the kinds of payments that firms make to national or local governments.…”
Section: Accounting Infrastructure and Promissory Sustainable Extract...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ESTMA mandates transparency, but it is not without criticisms, such as providing a lower verification standard than is required for annual financial statements, being weakly enforced, and excluding activities beyond oil, gas, and minerals, such as pipelines and exploration (Bildfell, 2016; Ciupa and Zalik, 2020). Payments reported under ESTMA must be disclosed on a cash basis, which is at odds with an accrual basis of financial reporting.…”
Section: The Evolution Of Estmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For more than a decade, Canada's reputation has suffered alongside that of Canadian extractive companies facing allegations of human rights violations, financial crimes, and environmental abuses in Latin America, Africa, Europe, and Western Canada (Deneault and Sacher, 2012; Ciupa and Zalik, 2020). For example, Gordon and Webber (2016) accuse the Canadian state of employing tactics to silence complaints by Latin American communities, and of advancing the interests of Canadian multinationals in the extractive industry.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 8. Such bailout strategies and policy-protected immunity can be flagged across the corporate spectrum in Canada, in the automotive (Fowler, 2012) and mining sectors (Ciupa and Zalik, 2020). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%