2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing construction safety: Machine learning-based classification of injury types

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Occupational accident field, 16 out of 61 papers dealt with data on accidents and injuries at work from 2014 to 2023. In the class "occupational accidents," the 89 out of 202 submissions covered the following topics: reporting of accidents [3,26,27,29,32,35,43,45,49,[59][60][61][62]75,76] and days away from work. On this topic, Yelda et al analysed textual narratives to predict injury outcome and days off work in a mining operation.…”
Section: Discussion and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Occupational accident field, 16 out of 61 papers dealt with data on accidents and injuries at work from 2014 to 2023. In the class "occupational accidents," the 89 out of 202 submissions covered the following topics: reporting of accidents [3,26,27,29,32,35,43,45,49,[59][60][61][62]75,76] and days away from work. On this topic, Yelda et al analysed textual narratives to predict injury outcome and days off work in a mining operation.…”
Section: Discussion and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The risk in non-randomised studies was assessed on the basis of the following biases: (1) due to confounding, (2) in the selection of the types of data in the study, (3) in the classification of the study objective, (4) due to missing data, (5) in the measurement of outcomes, (6) in the evaluation metrics and (7) in the selection of the reported outcome. Each individual study included was assessed as having a low, moderate, severe, and critical risk of bias.…”
Section: Risk Of Bias For Selected Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, DNN is commonly applied for the prediction and classification of data with complex non-linear relationships, as multiple layers act to identify diverse specific functions [ 43 ]. Consequently, this study suggests a framework for developing accident prediction models according to the construction scale using DNN, considering the non-linearity of the accident data of the construction site [ 35 , 44 , 45 ]. To determine the optimal DNN model, the prediction error was estimated by comparison with the multiple regression analysis (MRA) models.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The "others" includes the accident types (e.g., overexertion, occupational diseases, and fire) that cannot be classified in the remaining five accident types and takes small proportions, which can decrease the reliability of the classification results. The selection of the six types of accidents in this study is based on a comprehensive analysis of accident reports, existing literature, industry standards, and common occurrences in construction sites [13,29,43]. These six accident types encompass a broad spectrum of incidents that are frequently reported and have significant implications for construction site safety.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%