Enhancing collaboration in communities of professionals using a Living Lab approach

Budweg, Steffen; Schaffers, Hans; Ruland, Rudolf; Kristensen, Kjetil; Prinz, Wolfgang

doi:10.1080/09537287.2010.536630

Cited by 34 publications

(29 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Therefore, future research should investigate different types of Living Labs for comparison. In addition, the literature has not defined the Living Labs in a sufficient manner since there are only few scholarly attempts to describe Living Labs initiatives (Budweg et al, 2011). An important aspect is how scholars and practitioners should see Living Labs initiatives in terms of innovation management.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Towards innovation in Living Labs networks

Leminen

Westerlund

2012

IJPD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper focuses on Living Labs that are open user-centred environments for networked innovation development. Although the concept of open innovation has quickly attracted both the scientific and applied communities, research on Living Labs is scarce, and literature lacks understanding of the characteristics of the Living Labs model. We aim to describe what the Living Labs are from the innovation network perspective.Using a case study of a regional Living Labs initiative, we describe the key participants and their roles in the Living Labs network. In addition, we discuss their motives to participate in the network, as well as the outcomes and perceived challenges of innovation co-creation. According to our findings, Living Labs are a practical way of encouraging open innovation. They are dedicated inter-organisational environments that provide pertinent support for Concurrent Engineering's (CE) networked processes. The integration of users as co-producers in product development is imperative for success in the Living Labs model because it reveals their latent needs and enables unforeseen outcomes.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Towards innovation in Living Labs networks

Leminen

Westerlund

2012

IJPD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Living labs should comprise the development of a product, which can be all sorts of artifacts, including process innovations, and not only, for example, testing or implementation (Budweg et al, 2011;Coenen et al, 2014;Feurstein et al, 2008;Gray et al, 2014;Leminen, 2015;Schaffers et al, 2007;Tang & Hämäläinen, 2012). A key element in this development process is co-creation (Bijsterveldt, 2016;ENoLL, 2016;Feurstein et al, 2008;Franz et al, 2015;Gómez-Barroso et al, 2009;Heijden, 2016;Schaub, 2016).…”

Section: Kris Steen and Ellen Van Bueren Activitiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Defining Characteristics of Urban Living Labs

Steen

Bueren

2017

Technology Innovation Management Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Supporting every-day activities within home environments, therefore, reveals some of the challenges and opportunities for approaches to socio-technical design and evaluation that focus on the longer-term aspects of innovation, appropriation, and use in real-life settings, such as Living Labs [16,17].…”

Section: Cscw 2014 • Workhop Summarymentioning

confidence: 99%

Collaboration and coordination in the context of informal care (CCCiC 2014)

Tellioğlu

Lewkowicz

Carvalho

et al. 2014

Proceedings of the Companion Publication of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work &Amp; Social Computi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Past and current research studies recurrently acknowledge the relevance of technological developments to support informal caregivers with their activities and responsibilities. These studies highlight the demands associated with caregiving and suggest that further research in the area is needed to better understand such demands and to figure out more effective ways for technologies to support people who deal with them. In Europe, especial attention has been dedicated to informal caregivers for the past few years, due to indicators showing that more than 80% of the care for frail and old people, one of the major groups of care receivers in the region, is informally provided by family members and friends. The same scenario can be found across different continents, corroborating the relevance of the subject. Therefore, this workshop seeks contributions exploring issues of collaboration and coordination in the context of informal care. Early stage research studies in the area as well as contributions exploring the design and evaluation of computer technologies for it are most welcome.

show abstract

Enhancing collaboration in communities of professionals using a Living Lab approach

Cited by 34 publications

References 10 publications

Towards innovation in Living Labs networks

Towards innovation in Living Labs networks

The Defining Characteristics of Urban Living Labs

Collaboration and coordination in the context of informal care (CCCiC 2014)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About