2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2020.103039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing CO2 solubility in the aquifer with the use of a downhole cooler tools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed method is capable of minimizing the amount of CO 2 entering the formation as free gas entering; thus, the mobility of CO 2 flow is controlled. To introduce CO 2 as liquid into the formation (at 1500 m depth), it is required to reduce the temperature of CO 2 to −10 °C due to the heat exchange with the surrounding environment …”
Section: Physical Methods To Overcome the Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The proposed method is capable of minimizing the amount of CO 2 entering the formation as free gas entering; thus, the mobility of CO 2 flow is controlled. To introduce CO 2 as liquid into the formation (at 1500 m depth), it is required to reduce the temperature of CO 2 to −10 °C due to the heat exchange with the surrounding environment …”
Section: Physical Methods To Overcome the Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulation results show that during injection solubility increases up to 7%, 6%, and 13% and up to 14.5%, 13%, and 21% after injection was stopped at depths of 1000, 1500, and 2700 m, respectively. 62 The above mentioned simulation models have shown improvement in dissolution of CO 2 in brine. However, this suffers from limitations due to cooling the reservoir down near the wellbore, hydrate formation, applicability in the field, etc.…”
Section: Employment Of Downhole Coolermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the CaMI field research station, however, since the target formation of Phase 1 is located at a is 6 metres and there is a uniform geothermal temperature equal to 12.6 ˚C (Dongas and Lawton, 2014). It should be noted that the temperature difference between the injected CO 2 and the reservoir's geothermal temperature was the reason for choosing this project for investigating the impact of temperature on the wettability alteration of the reservoir rock (Abbaszadeh and Shariatipour, 2020). Bringing to mind that the wettability will change with temperature; thus, the temperature distribution in the reservoir will change the wettability conditions in some parts of the formation and create a wettability profile.…”
Section: Impact Of Temperature On the Wettability In The Containment ...mentioning
confidence: 99%