2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-3938.2011.01119.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing assessment of interpersonal violence (IPV) pregnancy-related homicide risk within nursing curricula

Abstract: Pregnancy and motherhood traditionally represent evolution of the next generation; yet, contemporary research and analyses confirm that this time can also be manifested in fear by the expectant mother within an environment of battering, cruelty, physical and emotional abuse, and sexual assault. Often to the surprise of many healthcare providers, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have consistently reported that Interpersonal Violence (IPV) related homicide is a leading cause of traumatic death amon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(20 reference statements)
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our review supports that the standard methods for intervention (i.e., universal screening) frequently yields low results due to a variety of barriers including the provider's lack of time or knowledge on the subject, lack of privacy, unfamiliarity with local IPV resources, or the victim's fear of increased violence if their partner finds out (Clements et al, 2011;Stonard & Whapples, 2016). Additionally, even when IPV is detected and a referral to resources are completed, risk of violence may prevent victims from accessing services, and the increased risk of abuse when a victim attempts to leave a violent relationship could cause further damage and potentially increase the risk of homicide (Adhia et al, 2019;Campbell et al, 2003;Cliffe et al, 2019;Decker et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussion: a Conceptual Model Of Iph In Pregnancysupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Our review supports that the standard methods for intervention (i.e., universal screening) frequently yields low results due to a variety of barriers including the provider's lack of time or knowledge on the subject, lack of privacy, unfamiliarity with local IPV resources, or the victim's fear of increased violence if their partner finds out (Clements et al, 2011;Stonard & Whapples, 2016). Additionally, even when IPV is detected and a referral to resources are completed, risk of violence may prevent victims from accessing services, and the increased risk of abuse when a victim attempts to leave a violent relationship could cause further damage and potentially increase the risk of homicide (Adhia et al, 2019;Campbell et al, 2003;Cliffe et al, 2019;Decker et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussion: a Conceptual Model Of Iph In Pregnancysupporting
confidence: 55%
“…In addition, studies showed that routine screening increased rates of disclosure [25] while the qualitative literature reported that most women support routine screening under most conditions, except when screening questions were asked in abrasive or judgmental tones of voice [26][27]. There are also some suggestions that paper and pencil self reports may be more effective in some health care settings [28][29] and legal settings [30] but these data were not available at the time of this project suggesting that a regular review and potential revision of the competencies is required.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%