Enhancing applications with approved location stamps

Zugenmaier, Alf; Kreutzer, Michael; Kabatnik, Matthias

doi:10.1109/inw.2001.915307

Cited by 15 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, it was proved later that as malicious entities could bypass such multi-channel combination approaches [21], GPS signatures [32] and such approaches were prone to spoofing attacks [33]. Zugenmaier et al [34] introduced the concept of location stamps, utilizing cell phones. Gruteser et al in [35] highlighted privacy concerns and proposed an anonymity-based privacy preserving localization technique.…”

Section: Evolution Timeline Of Location Proof Systemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Besides, no security measures were taken, leaving the scheme vulnerable to malicious user manipulations. Gonzalez-Tablas et al presented the notion of path stamps [44], extending the concept of location stamps [34] by recording the history of the visited location's proofs in a hash chain. However, none of the schemes formally described the requirements for a secure location provenance mechanism.…”

Section: Evolution Timeline Of Location Proof Systemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Location Proof Systems for Smart Internet of Things: Requirements, Taxonomy, and Comparative Analysis

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the current hyper-connected, data-driven era, smart devices are providing access to geolocation information, enabling a paradigm shift in diverse domains. Location proof systems utilize smart devices to provide witnessed proof of location to enable secure location-based services (LBS). Applications of location proof systems include safety, asset management and operations monitoring in health care, supply chain tracking, and Internet-of-Things (IoT)-based location intelligence in businesses. In this paper, we investigate the state of the art in location proof systems, examining design challenges and implementation considerations for application in the real world. To frame the analysis, we have developed a taxonomy of location proof systems and performed a comparative analysis over the common attributes, highlighting their strength and weaknesses. Furthermore, we have identified future trends for this increasingly important area of investigation and development.

show abstract

Section: Evolution Timeline Of Location Proof Systemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Evolution Timeline Of Location Proof Systemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Location Proof Systems for Smart Internet of Things: Requirements, Taxonomy, and Comparative Analysis

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…While tracks are similar to location provenance chains, security issues are not considered here making tracks vulnerable to attacks by malicious users. Zugenmaier et al introduced the notion of location stamps [31] for cell phones. The stamps provide proof about the location of the user at a certain time.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Otit

Khan

Zawoad

Haque

et al. 2014

Proceedings of the 9th ACM Symposium on Information, Computer and Communications Security

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Personal mobile devices and location based services are gaining popularity every day. Since the location based services are often customized based on the location information, it is important to securely generate, preserve, and validate the claim of presence at a given location at a given time as well as location provenancethe history of locations for a mobile device user over a given time period. Location provenance needs to imply secure and chronological ordering of location proofs, which can be successfully verified at a later time. Otherwise, the location based services can be easily spoofed by falsified location history. In this paper, we present OTIT -a model for designing secure location provenance. We formalized the features and characteristics for the domain of secure location provenance schemes, using formal propositional logic and logical proofs. We also present several schemes, which can be used in various modes to provide secure location provenance services. Based on the characteristics defined in OTIT, we have analyzed different schemes to show their adherence to the desired features of secure location provenance. Furthermore, we present experimental results on the performance of the various schemes, in terms of time and storage, to show a comparative applicability analysis. We posit that OTIT will serve as a comprehensive benchmark framework to evaluate the models for secure location provenance.

show abstract

“…A first group between these services provide evidences that may be certificate-like or credential-like. The proposals in [ZKK01,WF03] fall within the certificate-like category while the one proposed in [Bus04] can be classified as credential-like.…”

Section: Spatial-temporal Certification Servicesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Survey on Location Authentication Protocols and Spatial-Temporal Attestation Services

González-Tablas

Kursawe

Ramos

et al. 2005

Embedded and Ubiquitous Computing – EUC 2005 Workshops

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract.A survey on location authentication protocols and spatialtemporal attestation services is presented. Several protocols and services with these objectives have been proposed during the last decade, but still there is a lack of understanding of the security properties they should provide and which security mechanisms are appropriate. We first define the goals and threat model of location authentication protocols, next they are described and analyzed against this model. Also, spatial-temporal attestation services are described and classified depending on their goal and kind of issued evidence.

show abstract

Enhancing applications with approved location stamps

Cited by 15 publications

References 1 publication

Location Proof Systems for Smart Internet of Things: Requirements, Taxonomy, and Comparative Analysis

Location Proof Systems for Smart Internet of Things: Requirements, Taxonomy, and Comparative Analysis

Otit

Survey on Location Authentication Protocols and Spatial-Temporal Attestation Services

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About