2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.09.177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing antifogging/frost-resisting performances of amphiphilic coatings via cationic, zwitterionic or anionic polyelectrolytes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
52
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Antifogging performance of the blending coatings was evaluated by both qualitative and quantitative measurements. , First, optical images were photographed during both hot-vapor and cold-warm antifogging tests as showed in Figure A. The bare glass fogged up immediately either placing them over boiling water or after storing in a refrigerator for 30 min, whereas the coated surfaces maintained visible clearness under hot-vapor antifogging measurement, demonstrating a remarkable antifogging behavior.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Antifogging performance of the blending coatings was evaluated by both qualitative and quantitative measurements. , First, optical images were photographed during both hot-vapor and cold-warm antifogging tests as showed in Figure A. The bare glass fogged up immediately either placing them over boiling water or after storing in a refrigerator for 30 min, whereas the coated surfaces maintained visible clearness under hot-vapor antifogging measurement, demonstrating a remarkable antifogging behavior.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main reason of optical loss is endoscopic lens fogging, which is caused by the discrepancies in temperature and humidity between ambient conditions and in vivo . Most antifogging approaches for medical devices are based on traditional methods, for instance, spraying antifogging reagents or employing heating apparatus, but they show disadvantages of short residual action, cumbersome procedure, high medical expenses, and so on. , Currently, developing coating surfaces with enhanced antifogging performance has been gaining much attention to solve the atomization problem. In addition to superhydrophilic and superhydrophobic strategies, applying a water-absorbing coating with amphiphilicity to a surface is an effective antifogging approach, where the condensed water molecules or the moist vapor can be rapidly imbibed into the bulk of the coating, followed by uniform diffusion of the absorbed water molecules to prevent the formation of a large and light-scattering water domain. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Antifogging films have increasingly attracted much attention lately for a wide variety of practical applications including goggles, eyeglasses, windshields, mirrors, solar cells, medical/analytical instruments, and other industrial equipment. To achieve such antifogging properties, preparation of superhydrophilic surfaces with static water contact angles (CAs, θ S ) of less than 5° is one of the most promising approach because on such surfaces, condensed water will rapidly form into a continuous transparent water-thin layer instead of formation of many small droplets, allowing for the reduction of visible light scattering. , Superhydrophilic surfaces have been widely prepared based on various techniques including layer-by-layer (LbL) deposition, chemical vapor deposition (CVD), reactive ion/chemical etching, postcalcination, and so on, using silica (SiO 2 ) or UV-light-activated titanium dioxide (TiO 2 ) nanoparticles (NPs)/films, ,, positively/negatively charged polyelectrolytes and/or NPs, highly water-absorbent polymers, composite hydrogels, or polymer brushes. Among these approaches, conventional methods for the preparation of superhydrophilic surfaces relying on textured/layered structures can be complicated, time-consuming, and not suitable for mass production. In addition, such man-made superhydrophilic surfaces typically lack self-healing abilities observed on living surfaces and so their functionalities are immediately and permanently lost once they are physically or chemically damaged.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 2 ] There are widespread potential applications of materials with underwater superoleophobicity, such as antifouling, self‐cleaning, antifogging, and oil/water separation. [ 3–5 ]…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%