Enhancing & Mobilizing the POtential for Wellness & Emotional Resilience (EMPOWER) among Surrogate Decision-Makers of ICU Patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Abstract

Background Critical illness increases the risk for poor mental health outcomes among both patients and their informal caregivers, especially their surrogate decision-makers. Surrogates who must make life-and-death medical decisions on behalf of incapacitated patients may experience additional distress. EMPOWER (Enhancing & Mobilizing the POtential for Wellness & Emotional Resilience) is a novel cognitive-behavioral, acceptance-based intervention delivered in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting to surrogate decision-makers designed to improve both patients’ quality of life and death and dying as well as surrogates’ mental health. Methods Clinician stakeholder and surrogate participant feedback ( n = 15), as well as results from an open trial ( n = 10), will be used to refine the intervention, which will then be evaluated through a multisite randomized controlled trial (RCT) ( n = 60) to examine clinical superiority to usual care. Feasibility, tolerability, and acceptability of the intervention will be evaluated through self-report assessments. Hierarchical linear modeling will be used to adjust for clustering within interventionists to determine the effect of EMPOWER on surrogate differences in the primary outcome, peritraumatic stress. Secondary outcomes will include symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder, prolonged grief disorder, and experiential avoidance. Exploratory outcomes will include symptoms of anxiety, depression, and decision regret, all measured at 1 and 3 months from post-intervention assessment. Linear regression models will examine the effects of assignment to EMPOWER versus the enhanced usual care group on patient quality of life or quality of death and intensity of care the patient received during the indexed ICU stay assessed at the time of the post-intervention assessment. Participant exit interviews will be conducted at the 3-month assessment time point and will be analyzed using qualitative thematic data analysis methods. Discussion The EMPOWER study is unique in its application of evidence-based psychotherapy targeting peritraumatic stress to improve patient and caregiver outcomes in the setting of critical illness. The experimental intervention will be strengthened through the input of a variety of ICU stakeholders, including behavioral health clinicians, physicians, bereaved informal caregivers, and open trial participants. Results of the RCT will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and serve as preliminary data for a larger, multisite RCT grant application. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03276559 . Retrospectively registered on 8 September 2017. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-019-3515-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. ...

Bereavement risk screening: A pathway to psychosocial oncology care

“…A common theme was that, although engaging in bereavement risk screening may be emotionally challenging, it could provide an opportunity to be connected to psychosocial support, even before bereavement; this is consistent with research demonstrating the utility of discussing bereavement pre‐loss to increase preparedness for the patient's death 30 . Many family members indicated they would prefer follow‐up after completing screening, with several preferring contact with a mental health professional.…”

Regret and unfinished business in parents bereaved by cancer: A mixed methods study

“…Given the most common regrets centered around treatment decision-making, greater emotional and decision-making support appears warranted. 60 It should not be assumed that parents who reach a decision are at peace with that decision. As the disease progresses, healthcare providers might take special care to explore decisions made thus far, providing reassurance, supporting coupled parents when their opinions may differ, and applying the “what if” framework to gently consider feared scenarios.…”

Public knowledge, preferences and experiences about medical substitute decision-making: a national cross-sectional survey

“…Findings from a recent survey among the Canadian general population showed that most participants would support the introduction of a curriculum for senior high school students to learn about being an SDM, 31 further highlighting the need to develop and evaluate interventions that address the problem of a lack of preparedness to be an SDM in the general public. 44 In our study, a majority of participants preferred to obtain information from a health professional. This is consistent with a recent Australian study which found most people preferred to learn about end-oflife law from health professionals.…”