2016
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw495
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EnhancerAtlas: a resource for enhancer annotation and analysis in 105 human cell/tissue types

Abstract: Motivation: Multiple high-throughput approaches have recently been developed and allowed the discovery of enhancers on a genome scale in a single experiment. However, the datasets generated from these approaches are not fully utilized by the research community due to technical challenges such as lack of consensus enhancer annotation and integrative analytic tools. Results: We developed an interactive database, EnhancerAtlas, which contains an atlas of 2,534,123 enhancers for 105 cell/tissue types. A consensus … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
139
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(149 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(27 reference statements)
4
139
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this regard, it was somewhat remarkable that 3 variations in distinct linkage blocks strongly associated with IBD (ORs 2.1-4.3), strengthening the validity of each association. This association, however, does not indicate the causality of these SNPs, which is unlikely for the intronic SNPs rs10846086 and rs2889504, which do not fall into regions of high genetic conservation or known genetic enhancers of transcription (36). Neither does SNP rs12815313 in the 5# untranslated region (NM_001286233.1:c.-171G .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this regard, it was somewhat remarkable that 3 variations in distinct linkage blocks strongly associated with IBD (ORs 2.1-4.3), strengthening the validity of each association. This association, however, does not indicate the causality of these SNPs, which is unlikely for the intronic SNPs rs10846086 and rs2889504, which do not fall into regions of high genetic conservation or known genetic enhancers of transcription (36). Neither does SNP rs12815313 in the 5# untranslated region (NM_001286233.1:c.-171G .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Neither does SNP rs12815313 in the 5# untranslated region (NM_001286233.1:c.-171G . A) affect any known transcription factors or enhancer binding sites (36,37). As such, future studies to identify causal SNPs are warranted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the proportion of CNEs that may be acting as enhancers, we analysed downloaded enhancer RNA (eRNA) data from the fetal brain generated by the FANTOM5 consortium 32 and predicted fetal brain enhancers from EnhancerAtlas 33 , which combines multiple sources of data to identify enhancers in different tissues. We used the experimentally validated fetal brain-active VISTA enhancers to estimate this sensitivity of each data set.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5a). Analysis of the FANTOM5 32 and EnhancerAtlas 33 datasets suggests that 50-70% of the fetal brain-active CNEs act as enhancers (see Methods).…”
Section: Enrichment Of Mutations In Non-coding Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(B) Enhanceratlas.org tracks (accessed December, 2016) display chromatin loops observed in CD14 monocytes at this locus, providing a three-dimensional framework for potential enhancer-promoter interactions [65]. Knock-down of 774 and 775 affected acquisition of H3K4me2 (C), H3K27ac (D), H3K4me3 (E), and H3K4me2 (F) at Enhancer 1 (left panels) and to a lesser degree extent at the promoter (middle panels) after LPS.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%