2009
DOI: 10.1109/tpwrs.2009.2030409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancements to the Cumulant Method for Probabilistic Optimal Power Flow Studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The wind power output can be modeled as a negative load, and its power factor is kept constant [5]. References [36,37] built the model of CM for P-OPF with the load at each bus as a random input variable. In this paper, wind power output is also treated as a random input variable and incorporated into the computational model.…”
Section: Traditional CM For P-opfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wind power output can be modeled as a negative load, and its power factor is kept constant [5]. References [36,37] built the model of CM for P-OPF with the load at each bus as a random input variable. In this paper, wind power output is also treated as a random input variable and incorporated into the computational model.…”
Section: Traditional CM For P-opfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in [22] a chance-constrained optimal power dispatch strategy is developed for transmission systems, using cumulant-based stochastic models. The Gram-Charlier expansion method is applied in [22], [26], [27] to approximate the distribution of state variables; however, it reduces the accuracy of stochastic modelling. Such reduced accuracy could be inevitable in large transmission systems; but it may not be acceptable at distribution level, which is where we focus on in this paper.…”
Section: B Comparison To Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this aim, we approximate the chance constraints in (25) and (27) with some convex bounds in the form of their expected values, specifically by using the Markov Bounds [52]. We then compare the two approaches for the same set-up and objectives of Section IV-A.…”
Section: E Comparison With Scenario-based Stochastic Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…PPF methods mainly include three categories: simulation methods [5][6][7], approximate methods [8][9][10][11], and analytical methods [12][13][14][15][16]. Among simulation methods, the Monte Carlo simulation method (MCSM) is an outstanding representation, and it is regarded as a standard to evaluate the accuracy and efficiency of other PPF methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%