1986
DOI: 10.1016/0167-8817(86)90038-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancement of UV survival, UV- and MMS-mutability, precise excision of Tn10 and complementation of umuC by plasmids of different incompatibility groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, it should be noted that the high level of mutagenesis promoted by the cloned rumAB (R391) operon is in stark contrast to the limited ability of the native R391 plasmid to promote mutagenesis functions (8,27,28,39,53). One obvious explanation for this difference is that the UV sensitization gene(s) carried by R391 (and other IncJ plasmids) (35,39,53) masks the inherent ability of rumAB (R391) to exhibit mutagenic DNA repair.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, it should be noted that the high level of mutagenesis promoted by the cloned rumAB (R391) operon is in stark contrast to the limited ability of the native R391 plasmid to promote mutagenesis functions (8,27,28,39,53). One obvious explanation for this difference is that the UV sensitization gene(s) carried by R391 (and other IncJ plasmids) (35,39,53) masks the inherent ability of rumAB (R391) to exhibit mutagenic DNA repair.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…These so-called mutagenesis proteins can be expressed chromosomally, like the UmuDC proteins from Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium (19,37,48,52), or episomally from certain naturally occurring plasmids (23,31,37,38). Indeed, R plasmids from over 10 different incompatibility groups can restore or increase the mutation frequency in a variety of E. coli strains, suggesting that they carry functionally active Umu homologs (8,27,28,39,53).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though it appeared that the recombination reduction ability and the UV-sensitising functions were related, they were demonstrated to be separate functions by cloning [19,21]. In addition to the unusual UV-sensitising function, like many mobile elements [28] CTnR391, CTnR997 and CTnpMERPH have been shown to encode a UV-protection and mutagenesis-enhancing function [16]. In the case of CTnR391 this function is associated with the presence of two genes, rumA and rumB, which encode functional homologues of the E. coli UmuDC mutagenesis-enhancing proteins [21] and the well-studied MucAB system associated with pKM101 used in the Ames mutagen tester strains [29].…”
Section: Dna Repair Functionsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The only other report of an IncJ element was pMERPH from Pseudomonas putrefaciens isolated from the River Mersey, Great Britain, and transferred to Escherichia coli [14] (table 1). Transfer of IncJ elements has been demonstrated to a number of enterobacterial species including Escherichia coli K12, Salmonella typhimurium, Serratia marcessens, Proteus mirabilis 5006, Vibrio cholera (ElTor) and Pseudomonas [3, 5, [15][16][17]. The South African IncJ elements have been shown to be repressed for pilus synthesis, while in E. coli, CTnR997 has been shown to synthesise conjugative pili constitutively [15,18], possibly accounting for its higher transfer frequency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…First, research by others had suggested that they might contain umu analogs (5,39,54); second, unlike the IncN plasmid R46, which encodes mucAB; the IncI plasmid TP110, which encodes imppCAB, and the cryptic pSLT plasmid encoding samAB (all of which were isolated from Salmonella strains [23,30,38]), R391, R446b, and R471a were originally isolated from Providencia rettgeri (10, 36a), Morganella morganii (16, 36a), and Serratia marcescens (17), respectively, and therefore might have evolved differently from the previously identified Salmonella plasmids; and third, they appeared to promote mutagenesis functions to various degrees. In general, previous reports have suggested that R446b is more efficient at promoting mutagenesis functions than R471a (yet both come from the same plasmid incompatibility group) and both are much better than R391 (5,28,54). We hypothesized that if we were successful in cloning the umu-like genes from these plasmids, our results might provide us with a better insight into the structure-function relationship between these and the previously identified mutagenesis proteins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%