2021
DOI: 10.1208/s12249-021-01928-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancement of Therapies for Glioblastoma (GBM) Using Nanoparticle-based Delivery Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 179 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…GBM is one of the most aggressive forms of brain cancer that affects thousands of people and is notable for its poor prognoses. Since current strategies lack specificity, which leads to toxicity in healthy tissues and does not inhibit recurrences, targeted nanomedicines (NMeds) are being widely investigated as promising new tools, as demonstrated by an abundance of reviews in the last two years [ 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 ]. One of the most important aspects to consider when optimising a targeted NMed is selecting an appropriate targeting ligand.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GBM is one of the most aggressive forms of brain cancer that affects thousands of people and is notable for its poor prognoses. Since current strategies lack specificity, which leads to toxicity in healthy tissues and does not inhibit recurrences, targeted nanomedicines (NMeds) are being widely investigated as promising new tools, as demonstrated by an abundance of reviews in the last two years [ 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 ]. One of the most important aspects to consider when optimising a targeted NMed is selecting an appropriate targeting ligand.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is little consensus on the physiochemical constraints that govern “optimal” BBB penetration and drug delivery for GBM. For example, some studies report better active passage through the BBB with neutral structures ( Wiwatchaitawee et al, 2021 ), while anionic nanoparticles show dose-dependent effects on BBB penetration ( Lockman et al, 2004 ). On the contrary, cationic drug vehicles can facilitate brain uptake by adsorptive-mediated transcytosis or endocytosis ( Vieira and Gamarra, 2016 ) ( Joshi et al, 2014 ), while amphiphilic nanoparticles can take advantage of active and passive accumulation ( He et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combination of FeNP-based MHT with local injection of nano-adjuvants and systemic injection of anti-CTLA4 can lead to systemic therapeutic responses to inhibit tumor metastasis (75). In addition, nano-drugs, especially NPs combined with hyperthermia, are being studied as potential ways to enhance tumor drug delivery in patients with GBM (105).…”
Section: Brain Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%