We applaud the further investigation of the unexpected superconductivity in overdoped Sr 2 CuO 3+x by Gao et al., because there might be unusual physics responsible for the enhanced superconductivity that is observed. The lack of single phase material makes it difficult to interpret the data but we believe there exists relevant data in the literature that lead to different deductions than those presented by Gao et al. We suggest an alternative model that does not agree with their interpretation that the increase in cell volume due to the Ba doping is responsible for the marked increases the T c of Sr 2 CuO 3+x. upon doping with Ba and that the increase in the Cu-O in-plane bond length is the dominant factor. In our model there is no significant increase in T c with Ba doping when the data are normalized. We present additional data that show the effect of disorder in suppressing T c is overestimated. We further suggest that the agreement the authors find in the refinement of their x-ray powder diffraction data with their assumed structure is an artifact of the procedure used and does not provide meaningful evidence for the assumed location of the oxygen vacancies.There has been considerable uncertainty in identifying the phase responsible for the unusually high T c of Sr 2 CuO 4-v following its first synthesis under high pressure in the presence of KClO 4 by Hiroi et al. in 1993 [1]. Those authors and subsequent workers used the formula Sr 2 CuO 3+x because the synthesis involves adding oxygen to the Sr 2 CuO 3 starting material.However, the unit cell obtained is of the K 2 NiF 4 type so that it is more appropriately written as Sr 2 CuO 4-v . The synthesis is difficult; it requires high pressures and temperatures in the presence of a strong oxidizing agent and the retention of the metastable superconducting phase in a multiphase sample. The results were confirmed and significantly extended in a series of further investigations [2,3,4,5]. However, a subsequent investigation [6] that employed a much weaker oxidizing agent, KClO 3 , than the KClO 4 used by the earlier workers, led to the identification of a trace amount of superconductor in a small region along one side of the sample.