2020
DOI: 10.1109/tnano.2020.3022662
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancement of Responsivity and Sensitivity of p-Silicon/n-Zinc Oxide-Based Photodetector Using Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, a comparison of the performance metrics of ZnO-based photodetectors [48][49][50] has been summarized in Table 1. Therefore, we believe that ZnO NRs coated with TiO2 appear as one of the highly-sensitive self-powered ultraviolet photo detectors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, a comparison of the performance metrics of ZnO-based photodetectors [48][49][50] has been summarized in Table 1. Therefore, we believe that ZnO NRs coated with TiO2 appear as one of the highly-sensitive self-powered ultraviolet photo detectors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For n-type doping of Si, the prepared sample is then placed in a quartz tube furnace at 750 °C, and oxygen gas and argon gas are flown simultaneously into the tube for 30 min to bubble POCl 3 liquid . On the gate oxide of the device, ZnO nanorods are deposited by the hydrothermal method (Figure c). , ZnO nanorods are synthesized by putting samples into an equimolar (7 mM) aqueous solution of zinc nitrate (Zn­(NO 3 ) 2 ) and hexamethylenetetramine (HMTA; C 6 H 12 N 4 ). Samples submerged in the solution are kept in an oven at a temperature of 90 °C for 24 h. After 24 h, the samples are dipped in DI water and blow-dried with nitrogen.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7] Despite the significance of photodetectors and the progress made in machine learning (ML) techniques, a research gap exists in the comprehensive ML modeling of photodetector performance prediction. Existing experimental studies have predominantly focused on specific aspects of photodetector optimization, such as material characterization, [8,9] device architecture, [10][11][12] or fabrication process refinement. [13,14] However, there is a noticeable lack of research dedicated to predicting photodetector responsivity using ML models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%