2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.joule.2018.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancement of Interfacial Solar Vapor Generation by Environmental Energy

Abstract: For the environmental energy-enhanced interfacial solar vapor generator, through elegant structural designs, there will be a net energy gain from the environment during the solar vapor generation, yielding an evaporation rate exceeding the theoretical value, assuming a 100% solar-to-vapor energy transfer efficiency.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
381
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 528 publications
(388 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
6
381
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Water molecules in PGF (saturated under RH = 100% and water uptake at 5.2 g g −1 ) can be wholly released within 7 min under 1 sun in the open air for a sample of 10 cm in diameter and 1 cm in thickness (red curve in Figure 4b). [35][36][37][38] Then, the average water evaporation rate decreases to be about 0.49 kg m −2 h −1 (from 300 to 420 s), with the surface temperature of PGF increasing at the end of the desorption process. The proposed reason should be that water desorption of PGF consumes most of the input solar energy and induces a low surface temperature.…”
Section: Doi: 101002/adma201905875mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Water molecules in PGF (saturated under RH = 100% and water uptake at 5.2 g g −1 ) can be wholly released within 7 min under 1 sun in the open air for a sample of 10 cm in diameter and 1 cm in thickness (red curve in Figure 4b). [35][36][37][38] Then, the average water evaporation rate decreases to be about 0.49 kg m −2 h −1 (from 300 to 420 s), with the surface temperature of PGF increasing at the end of the desorption process. The proposed reason should be that water desorption of PGF consumes most of the input solar energy and induces a low surface temperature.…”
Section: Doi: 101002/adma201905875mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the synthetic tree could effectively convert solar flux to heat and achieve the interfacial evaporation model. For synthetic tree II, the steady‐state surface temperature and evaporation rate were 37°C and 2.03 kg m −2 hours −1 , respectively, because its evaporation area is doubled compared to that of synthetic tree I and ambient heat is harvested 36 . The temperature distribution in the infrared thermal image also confirms that solar‐heat was localized at the evaporation interface, and that the ambient environmental energy enhanced water evaporation (Figure 4C; Figure S5).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…[121] The Hg 2+ concentration levels were also reduced from 200 to 1 ppb to reach the EPA standard during water evaporation process, ascribed to the strong adsorption ability of MoS 2 in the solar absorber. For instance, the concentration of heavy metal ions (e.g., Cu 2+ , Cr 3+ , and Pb 2+ ) in the as-collected distillate was 0.066, <0.01 mg L −1 , and <0.01 mg L −1 , respectively, which were much lower than that of effluent discharge content (the stipulated upper concentrations of Cu 2+ , Cr 3+ , and Pb 2+ are 0.2, 0.5, and 0.2 mg L −1 , respectively).…”
Section: Applications Associated With Water Evaporationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[125] It has found that 3D artificial umbrella-like evaporator displays a lowest surface temperature (32.7 °C) but highest solar vapor generation efficiency (85%) under one sun than that of two other evaporators (39.5 °C/49% for 2D direct contact evaporator, 43.0 °C/76% for 2D indirect contact evaporator). [121] Copyright 2018, Elsevier. It is because that low working temperature also deteriorates the water evaporation efficiency.…”
Section: Strategies For Enhancing Water Evaporation Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation