2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.cep.2004.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancement of hydrocyclone separation performance by eliminating the air core

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
22
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Chu et al (2002) designed a hydrocyclone with a winged core to control the turbulence structure characteristics, which resulted in a lower energy loss coefficient, higher reduced separation efficiency, higher separation sharpness and larger capacity. Subsequently, Chu et al (2004) reported a new hydrocyclone design with a solid core fixed along the central axis, which effectively eliminated the air core. The experimental results obtained with this new design showed that the separation efficiency was improved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chu et al (2002) designed a hydrocyclone with a winged core to control the turbulence structure characteristics, which resulted in a lower energy loss coefficient, higher reduced separation efficiency, higher separation sharpness and larger capacity. Subsequently, Chu et al (2004) reported a new hydrocyclone design with a solid core fixed along the central axis, which effectively eliminated the air core. The experimental results obtained with this new design showed that the separation efficiency was improved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hydrocyclones are getting more and more interest from various industries, because of their advantages such as design and operational simplicity, high capacity (volumetric flow rate), low maintenance and operating costs, and small space of equipment (Chu et al, 2004). Despite the advantage of the conventional hydrocyclones, this device has undergone many modifications to enable it to meet specific process requirements (Souza et al, 2000;Vieira et al, 2005Vieira et al, , 2007Oliveira et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subgrid scale modelling of interface deformation due to turbulence is still an open issue and although both options might be selected simultaneously in commercial CFD softwares there is no validation of such a use on benchmark two-phase flows. Due to the inherent limitation of coupling between turbulent models and multiphase models, many studies have already been reported on hydrocyclone flow field and performance evaluation through CFD modelling approach without simulating the air core features (Gupta et al, 2008;Zhen-Bo et al, 2011;Karimi et al, 2012;Zhu et al, 2012;Murthy and Bhaskar, 2012;Davailles et al, 2012;Hwang et al, 2013;Swain and Mohanty, 2013;Banerjee et al, 2015), while some authors quantified the hydrocyclone flow field from another viewpoint by considering air core as a hollow tube (Chu et al, 2004;Sripriya et al, 2007;Evans et al, 2008). From their results, no discrepancy is observed between the predicted velocity profile and experimental observation reported in existing literature.…”
Section: Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 72%