2016
DOI: 10.1038/srep18784
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancement of Contralesional Motor Control Promotes Locomotor Recovery after Unilateral Brain Lesion

Abstract: There have been controversies on the contribution of contralesional hemispheric compensation to functional recovery of the upper extremity after a unilateral brain lesion. Some studies have demonstrated that contralesional hemispheric compensation may be an important recovery mechanism. However, in many cases where the hemispheric lesion is large, this form of compensation is relatively limited, potentially due to insufficient connections from the contralesional hemisphere to the paralyzed side. Here, we used … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, this local L2/3 randomness of synaptic connectivity can be useful for not only rewiring synaptic connections by experience-dependent plasticity during development, but also during rehabilitation (Sur et al, 1988; Recanzone et al, 1993; Rothschild and Mizrahi, 2015; Hua et al, 2016). Independent of the intrinsic changes of molecular and cellular composition of neurons and circuits (Monyer et al, 1994; Sheng et al, 1994), this L2/3 randomness principle provides another explanation as to why such a re-wiring process is difficult and slow.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, this local L2/3 randomness of synaptic connectivity can be useful for not only rewiring synaptic connections by experience-dependent plasticity during development, but also during rehabilitation (Sur et al, 1988; Recanzone et al, 1993; Rothschild and Mizrahi, 2015; Hua et al, 2016). Independent of the intrinsic changes of molecular and cellular composition of neurons and circuits (Monyer et al, 1994; Sheng et al, 1994), this L2/3 randomness principle provides another explanation as to why such a re-wiring process is difficult and slow.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There had been wide discussion on the role of contralesional hemispheric compensation in the functional rehabilitation of the paralyzed UL. The ipsilesional pathway had great potential for controlling both hands using the contralesional hemisphere, which could account for 10-20% of all corticospinal projections (Riecker et al, 2010;Hua et al, 2016). Therefore, enhanced contralesional hemisphere activation might successfully compensate for motor control for patients after stroke.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies have reported using a subcutaneous approach and sural or ulnar nerve graft anastomosis to transfer the contralateral C7 nerve root 14 , 15 . However, nerve regeneration by such methods requires six months, which can hinder the motor recovery process and even potentially influence brain plasticity 14 . In previous studies, contralateral C7 transfer was performed in rats, and the bilateral C7 nerve was used via 4 strands of the interpositional autografted sural nerve.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%