1993
DOI: 10.1006/viro.1993.1034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancement of Bovine Leukemia Virus-Induced Syncytia Formation by Di- and Tripeptides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same mutational strategy has been used successfully to suppress the ability of tilted peptides to induce liposome fusion in vitro (19) and, when applied to the tilted peptides of the SIV and bovine leukemia virus (BLV) envelope glycoproteins, to reduce strongly or even abolish virus fusion processes (22,23). Here, likewise we show that an MBP-fused variant of 16K hPRL, characterized by mutations that respect the amino acid composition but disrupt the hydrophobicity gradient in the tilted peptide region, is less antiangiogenic than MBP-fused wild-type 16K hPRL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The same mutational strategy has been used successfully to suppress the ability of tilted peptides to induce liposome fusion in vitro (19) and, when applied to the tilted peptides of the SIV and bovine leukemia virus (BLV) envelope glycoproteins, to reduce strongly or even abolish virus fusion processes (22,23). Here, likewise we show that an MBP-fused variant of 16K hPRL, characterized by mutations that respect the amino acid composition but disrupt the hydrophobicity gradient in the tilted peptide region, is less antiangiogenic than MBP-fused wild-type 16K hPRL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its predicted oblique insertion across the lipid-water interface is proposed to trigger local phospholipid disorganization and to generate a new lipid phase favoring fusion (17). Modification of the insertion angle of the bovine leukemia virus (BLV) and SIV peptides is apparently sufficient to abolish fusion (22,23).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The substitution of the T for E residues at position 14 in any of the two peptides (p5→p3 or p6→p4) or the scrambling of the amino acid sequence of p5 (randomizing p5 sequence) abolished the effect of enhancement, thus showing the specificity of the interaction and its amino acid sequence dependence. Enhancement of virus infectivity was described before for 2- to 3-mer peptides in bovine leukaemia virus (Voneche et al ., 1993 ) and for 4-mer peptides in xenotropic murine retrovirus (Suk & Long, 1983 ) but not for larger peptides. To our knowledge, only a peptide sequence with antiviral activity against grass carp haemorrhage reovirus has been selected before from a nona-peptide library displayed on phages (Wang et al ., 2000 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, synthetic peptides with amino acid sequences corresponding to the N terminus of the transmembrane glycoprotein gp41 of HIV type 1 (HIV-1) were also found to inhibit HIV glycoprotein-induced membrane fusion (45,55). In contrast to the inhibitory effect of such N-terminal peptides, similar di-and tripeptides surprisingly exert an enhancer effect in bovine leukemia virus glycoprotein-mediated syncytium formation (59).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%